![]() |
2017-05-10
, 19:07
|
|
Posts: 411 |
Thanked: 1,105 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Europe
|
#621
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to BluesLee For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2017-05-10
, 20:44
|
Posts: 635 |
Thanked: 1,535 times |
Joined on Feb 2014
@ Germany
|
#622
|
I contacted 'kido' of AsteroidOS today. The 'brcm-patchram-plus' tool alone is not enough. We also need to patch 'bluesleep.c' in the kernel sources. I got some links now and will have a closer look into it. Obviously I do this on the CM12 kernel sources. I guess you use a newer kernel now with the CM13 base.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mautz For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2017-05-10
, 21:44
|
Posts: 97 |
Thanked: 318 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
@ Switzerland
|
#623
|
I saw something like that when looking through their github page. Could you post the necessary commits?
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to minimec For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2017-05-10
, 21:56
|
Posts: 635 |
Thanked: 1,535 times |
Joined on Feb 2014
@ Germany
|
#624
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mautz For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2017-05-10
, 22:01
|
Posts: 97 |
Thanked: 318 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
@ Switzerland
|
#625
|
Seems like most of the patches in bluesleep.c are already included in cm12.1 kernel. Adding the rest seems easy, if it doesn't throw any build errors.
I haven't figued out how to build brcm-patchram-plus, but i only tried for a few minutes...
Thanks again!
19:07 @ kido : ok, anyway the patch just takes a couple of minutes to write. it's just a matter of hooking the standard kernel's HCI subsystem's HCI_DEV_REG, HCI_DEV_UNREG and HCI_DEV_WRITE to a handler in bluesleep.c that reproduces what bluesleep_write_proc_lpm and bluesleep_write_proc_btwrite do on the equivalents event
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to minimec For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2017-08-18
, 14:24
|
Posts: 171 |
Thanked: 337 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#627
|
![]() |
2017-08-18
, 15:20
|
|
Posts: 411 |
Thanked: 1,105 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Europe
|
#629
|
I am still using SFOS version 2.0.5.6 based on CM 12.1. The main reason for this being the unresolved (?) video recording problems with CM 13.
...
So here's the big question: Is it possible to upgrade from 2.0.5.6 to version 2.1.0.11 using the same procedure as before? If so, are there any caveats to be aware of?
Looking forward to hearing from you.
![]() |
2017-08-19
, 21:12
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 1,832 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#630
|
The Following User Says Thank You to m4r0v3r For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
hammerhead, nexus5, sailfishos, sfdroid |
Thread Tools | |
|