Active Topics
-
Camera phone competition March 2023 "Endless" (35)
to General by Maemish - 2 days, 11 hrs ago -
TLS 1.2 for N9 is ready (28)
to MeeGo / Harmattan by smartblu9 - 2 days, 12 hrs ago -
Maemo repository (3)
to Community by torsen - 3 days, 4 hrs ago -
Error after installing Leste on sdcard (11)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Maemish - 4 days, 1 hr ago -
Introducing ubiboot N9 (multiboot OS loader) (1,393)
to Alternatives by smatkovi - 5 days, 8 hrs ago - more...
|
2009-12-22
, 12:19
|
|
Posts: 236 |
Thanked: 223 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ NE UK
|
#52
|
Thanks for the interesting link. Just one minor nitpick (I can't help myself 
)
On a compressed filesystem, this might be misleading because the "4k block" has only a virtual existence and doesn't reflect the actual disk usage associated with the file. At least as I understand it.
You can see this below. ls shows the file size (1 byte) whereas du shows (what it thinks is) the disk allocation..
~# echo > testfile
~# ls -l testfile
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1 Dec 22 12:18 testfile
~# du -h testfile
4.0k testfile
)
Originally Posted by SubCore
Well, kind of. du is supposed to report the disk allocation associated with the file. On an ext3 filesystem where the block size is 4k, even a 1 byte file will have a 4k block allocated to it, and du will show this.
"du" however reports the actual size of the files
On a compressed filesystem, this might be misleading because the "4k block" has only a virtual existence and doesn't reflect the actual disk usage associated with the file. At least as I understand it.
You can see this below. ls shows the file size (1 byte) whereas du shows (what it thinks is) the disk allocation..
~# echo > testfile
~# ls -l testfile
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1 Dec 22 12:18 testfile
~# du -h testfile
4.0k testfile
 |
|
2009-12-22
, 12:30
|
|
Posts: 246 |
Thanked: 204 times |
Joined on Jun 2007
@ Potsdam (Germany)
|
#53
|
Hi,
thanks for the long list of non-optified applications. There is a list in the wiki where the applications should be added to track which are already optified for which are already exististing bug reports and so on:
http://wiki.maemo.org/Opt_Problem/Non-Optified_packages
For example fennec/firefox and vagalume are optified after reporting and a lot of other developers which are contacted are aware of the problem and will optify their packages.
Thank you,
Uwe
thanks for the long list of non-optified applications. There is a list in the wiki where the applications should be added to track which are already optified for which are already exististing bug reports and so on:
http://wiki.maemo.org/Opt_Problem/Non-Optified_packages
For example fennec/firefox and vagalume are optified after reporting and a lot of other developers which are contacted are aware of the problem and will optify their packages.
Thank you,
Uwe
__________________
|
|
2009-12-23
, 06:34
|
|
Posts: 118 |
Thanked: 45 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Germany
|
#54
|
Originally Posted by SubCore
I confirm the "du" behavior.
"du" does NOT follow symbolic links, i just tested it.
btw, -P is the du-switch to deactivate symlinks, but it's not present on the tablet, and it's supposed to be default anyways.
what makes you say that du follows links? any hard evidence?
What I did is:
I put the perl script on my device. I run it:
Code:
ssh root@mydevice mentionedPerlScript.pl /var/lib/dpkg/info/*.md5sums > /home/user/apps/nonOptified.txt
Code:
mc : 4.00K /usr/share/applications/hildon/mc.desktop mc : 4.00K /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps/mc.png mc : 68.00K /usr/share/locale/az/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 68.00K /usr/share/locale/be/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 80.00K /usr/share/locale/bg/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 68.00K /usr/share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 72.00K /usr/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 64.00K /usr/share/locale/da/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 72.00K /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 8.00K /usr/share/locale/el/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 76.00K /usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 68.00K /usr/share/locale/eu/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 20.00K /usr/share/locale/fi/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 68.00K /usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 76.00K /usr/share/locale/hu/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 76.00K /usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 64.00K /usr/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 64.00K /usr/share/locale/ko/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 76.00K /usr/share/locale/lt/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 64.00K /usr/share/locale/lv/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 84.00K /usr/share/locale/mn/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 72.00K /usr/share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 64.00K /usr/share/locale/no/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 76.00K /usr/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 68.00K /usr/share/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 64.00K /usr/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 68.00K /usr/share/locale/ro/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 76.00K /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 68.00K /usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 68.00K /usr/share/locale/sl/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 68.00K /usr/share/locale/sr/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 68.00K /usr/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 12.00K /usr/share/locale/ta/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 64.00K /usr/share/locale/tr/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 76.00K /usr/share/locale/uk/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 80.00K /usr/share/locale/vi/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 48.00K /usr/share/locale/wa/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 60.00K /usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 56.00K /usr/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/mc.mo mc : 8.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/README mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/bpp mc : 12.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/rpm mc : 12.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/trpm mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/u7z mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/a mc : 12.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/apt mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/audio mc : 8.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/deb mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/deba mc : 12.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/debd mc : 12.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/dpkg mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/iso9660 mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/hp48 mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/lslR mc : 8.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/mailfs mc : 12.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/patchfs mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/rpms mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/ualz mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/uar mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/uarj mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/uha mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/ulha mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/urar mc : 16.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/uzip mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/extfs/uzoo mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/bin/mc.csh mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/bin/mc.sh mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/bin/mc-wrapper.csh mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/bin/mc-wrapper.sh mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/mc.hint mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/mc.hint.cs mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/mc.hint.es mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/mc.hint.hu mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/mc.hint.it mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/mc.hint.nl mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/mc.hint.pl mc : 8.00K /usr/share/mc/mc.hint.ru mc : 8.00K /usr/share/mc/mc.hint.sr mc : 8.00K /usr/share/mc/mc.hint.uk mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/mc.hint.zh mc : 12.00K /usr/share/mc/mc.menu.sr mc : 160.00K /usr/share/mc/mc.hlp.es mc : 140.00K /usr/share/mc/mc.hlp.hu mc : 136.00K /usr/share/mc/mc.hlp.it mc : 156.00K /usr/share/mc/mc.hlp.pl mc : 284.00K /usr/share/mc/mc.hlp.ru mc : 240.00K /usr/share/mc/mc.hlp.sr mc : 128.00K /usr/share/mc/mc.hlp mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/ada95.syntax mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/aspx.syntax mc : 12.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/assembler.syntax mc : 8.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/c.syntax mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/changelog.syntax mc : 8.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/cs.syntax mc : 20.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/css.syntax mc : 20.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/d.syntax mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/diff.syntax mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/dos.syntax mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/eiffel.syntax mc : 12.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/fortran.syntax mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/html.syntax mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/idl.syntax mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/java.syntax mc : 8.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/js.syntax mc : 12.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/latex.syntax mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/lisp.syntax mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/lsm.syntax mc : 8.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/lua.syntax mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/m4.syntax mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/mail.syntax mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/makefile.syntax mc : 8.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/ml.syntax mc : 8.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/nroff.syntax mc : 12.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/octave.syntax mc : 12.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/pascal.syntax mc : 12.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/perl.syntax mc : 320.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/php.syntax mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/po.syntax mc : 12.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/povray.syntax mc : 12.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/python.syntax mc : 8.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/ruby.syntax mc : 12.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/sh.syntax mc : 8.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/smalltalk.syntax mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/slang.syntax mc : 8.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/spec.syntax mc : 20.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/sql.syntax mc : 8.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/swig.syntax mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/syntax.syntax mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/tcl.syntax mc : 12.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/texinfo.syntax mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/unknown.syntax mc : 4.00K /usr/share/mc/syntax/xml.syntax mc : 4.00K /usr/share/doc-base/MC-FAQ mc : 4.00K /usr/share/menu/mc mc : 0.00K /usr/bin/mc mc : 4.00K /usr/bin/mcmfmt mc : 4.00K /usr/bin/mcview-debian mc : 4.00K /usr/bin/mcedit-debian mc : 8.00K /usr/libexec/mc/cons.saver mc : total non-opt usage: 4.48M
Code:
ls -l /usr/share/mc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Dec 21 18:35 /usr/share/mc -> /home/usr/share/mc
Code:
df /usr/share rootfs 233224 147480 81460 64% /
Code:
df /usr/share/mc /dev/mmcblk0p1 27871100 914160 25541160 3% /home
Code:
du -sch /home/usr/share/mc 2.1M /home/usr/share/mc
Code:
l /usr/bin/mc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Dec 21 19:46 /usr/bin/mc -> /home/usr/bin/mc
Code:
l -h /home/usr/bin/mc -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 773.3k Oct 10 11:46 /home/usr/bin/mc
Last edited by emesem; 2009-12-23 at 06:49.
| The Following User Says Thank You to emesem For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-12-23
, 09:01
|
|
Posts: 236 |
Thanked: 223 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ NE UK
|
#55
|
Originally Posted by emesem
Yep, that's definitely a problem with the script. (du is behaving as expected, but the script doesn't take account of symlinked directories). I'll try and fix soon. In the meantime, anyone else.. please feel free
I confirm the "du" behavior.
|
|
2009-12-23
, 10:35
|
|
Posts: 236 |
Thanked: 223 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ NE UK
|
#56
|
Ok, here's an amended version of the script which tries to check for symlinked directories (by parsing the output of ls -l .. yuck!) ... recursively and with caching. May well be full of holes.. feedback welcome
I've put the extension as .txt to allow file-upload.
Edit: I've also updated the original script where first posted between [code] tags, above.
Last edited by kwotski; 2009-12-23 at 11:10.
I've put the extension as .txt to allow file-upload.
Edit: I've also updated the original script where first posted between [code] tags, above.
Last edited by kwotski; 2009-12-23 at 11:10.
| The Following User Says Thank You to kwotski For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2009-12-23
, 11:01
|
|
Posts: 850 |
Thanked: 626 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#57
|
Originally Posted by kwotski
instead of parsing for "->", you can just use this file test function:
Ok, here's an amended version of the script which tries to check for symlinked directories (by parsing the output of ls -l .. yuck!) ... recursively and with caching. May well be full of holes.. feedback welcome
Code:
if -l $file
i'll give your script a go a bit later when i have more time.
__________________
"What we perceive is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning."
-- Werner Karl Heisenberg
"What we perceive is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning."
-- Werner Karl Heisenberg
|
|
2009-12-23
, 11:08
|
|
Posts: 236 |
Thanked: 223 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ NE UK
|
#58
|
Originally Posted by SubCore
Actually, I do use that, but I need to find where it is linked to
instead of parsing for "->", you can just use this file test function:
that's probably more reliableCode:if -l $file
|
|
2009-12-23
, 11:28
|
|
Posts: 850 |
Thanked: 626 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#59
|
Originally Posted by kwotski
ah yes, i'm sorry, should've read your script more careful.
Actually, I do use that, but I need to find where it is linked to
for parsing the target of a link, there's a dedicated command available: readlink
Code:
~ $ readlink /opt /home/opt
__________________
"What we perceive is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning."
-- Werner Karl Heisenberg
"What we perceive is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning."
-- Werner Karl Heisenberg
| The Following User Says Thank You to SubCore For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-12-25
, 07:29
|
|
Posts: 118 |
Thanked: 45 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Germany
|
#60
|
Thank you for the rework. Also thank you for the effort you invest (script size doubled).
Unfortunately I still see some issues
(and I still did not learn perl ).
The mc package (which I moved away and linked it) seems to be handled correctly now. Thank you.
But now I just saw the following thing.
Report from the actual script version; from your original post (which I used):
So I guess there are more filesystem checks needed. Because for me it looks like the addblock-plus reported by the script are not on rootfs. For me "optified" means more "not on rootfs" than in a specific directory. Maybe thats where my problem comes from ^^.
But I would tend to say adblock-plus-1.0 is optified, though it is not in /opt.
Sorry for that trouble
.
Unfortunately I still see some issues
(and I still did not learn perl ).The mc package (which I moved away and linked it) seems to be handled correctly now. Thank you
.But now I just saw the following thing.
Report from the actual script version; from your original post (which I used):
Code:
adblock-plus-1.0 : 84.00K /home/user/.mozilla/microb/adblockplus/patterns.ini
adblock-plus-1.0 : 4.00K /home/user/.mozilla/microb/adblockplus/patterns-backup1.ini
adblock-plus-1.0 : 20.00K /home/user/.mozilla/microb/extensions/{d10d0bf8-f5b5-c8b4-a8b2-2b9879e08c5d}/components/nsAdblockPlus.js
adblock-plus-1.0 : 1.31M /home/user/.mozilla/microb/extensions/{d10d0bf8-f5b5-c8b4-a8b2-2b9879e08c5d}/chrome/adblockplus.jar
adblock-plus-1.0 : 4.00K /home/user/.mozilla/microb/extensions/{d10d0bf8-f5b5-c8b4-a8b2-2b9879e08c5d}/install.js
adblock-plus-1.0 : 8.00K /home/user/.mozilla/microb/extensions/{d10d0bf8-f5b5-c8b4-a8b2-2b9879e08c5d}/chrome.manifest
adblock-plus-1.0 : 4.00K /home/user/.mozilla/microb/extensions/{d10d0bf8-f5b5-c8b4-a8b2-2b9879e08c5d}/install.rdf
adblock-plus-1.0 : 4.00K /home/user/.mozilla/microb/extensions/{d10d0bf8-f5b5-c8b4-a8b2-2b9879e08c5d}/defaults/preferences/adblockplus.js
adblock-plus-1.0 : total non-opt usage: 1.43M
Code:
l /home/user/.mozilla/microb/extensions/{d10d0bf8-f5b5-c8b4-a8b2-2b9879e08c5d}/chrome/adblockplus.jar
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1367870 Oct 15 09:08 /home/user/.mozilla/microb/extensions/{d10d0bf8-f5b5-c8b4-a8b2-2b9879e08c5d}/chrome/adblockplus.jar
Code:
df /home/user/.mozilla/microb/extensions/{d10d0bf8-f5b5-c8b4-a8b2-2b9879e08c5d}/chrome/adblockplus.jar
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mmcblk0p1 27871100 989128 25466192 4% /home
But I would tend to say adblock-plus-1.0 is optified, though it is not in /opt.
Sorry for that trouble
.
http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/f...ml#L_df_report
"df" only reports the physically allocated memory and does not account for the compression that's taking place.
"du" however reports the actual size of the files, and not their compressed, physical size.
Thus, "du" will always report a higher usage than "df".
"What we perceive is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning."
-- Werner Karl Heisenberg