![]() |
2010-02-03
, 09:09
|
Posts: 543 |
Thanked: 181 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Universe,LocalCluster.MilkyWay.Sol.Earth.Europe.Slovenia.Ljubljana
|
#2
|
![]() |
2010-02-03
, 09:19
|
|
Posts: 247 |
Thanked: 106 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Coventry, UK
|
#3
|
![]() |
2010-02-03
, 09:22
|
Posts: 489 |
Thanked: 404 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#4
|
![]() |
2010-02-03
, 09:37
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#5
|
Hi guys, I've searched in Bugzilla and I've found a bug report about that.
The bad new? It's a WONTFIX...
Have a look:
https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4006
![]() |
2010-02-03
, 09:46
|
Posts: 489 |
Thanked: 404 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#6
|
have you read why it has been tagged wontfix? because its only about the fact that alarm plays 4 times and stops. nothing more. so resolution of the bug would be "alarm plays 14 times".
I'll try to reproduce this and file a bug (and paste link here) if I succeed.
![]() |
2010-02-03
, 09:53
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#7
|
Maybe I've misread something, because I can't get to the point.
EDIT: Ok, maybe I've understood. You are saying that our needed solution is "After 4 times playing, assume Snooze", right?
By the way, I'm experiencing only 2 times playing, I've not 4 times cycle...
![]() |
2010-02-03
, 10:06
|
|
Posts: 663 |
Thanked: 282 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ London, UK
|
#8
|
Hi guys, I've searched in Bugzilla and I've found a bug report about that.
The bad new? It's a WONTFIX...
Have a look:
https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4006
![]() |
2010-02-03
, 10:08
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#9
|
But don't worry, it's fixed in Maemo 6!
"Also related to this request, in Harmattan the user will be able to define
longer snoozing times - perhaps useful for those with deep dreams." -Quim Gil (Nokia)
![]() |
2010-02-03
, 10:09
|
Posts: 489 |
Thanked: 404 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#10
|
Personally, I think this is incorrect behavior, I think the alarm event should assume the behaviour of "Snooze" even when user doesn't react to the alarm window.
What do you think? Should this be consider a bug? I have searched bugzilla and there is no one complaining about the behavior so I figure it's better to ask first...
Last edited by sony123; 2010-02-03 at 01:23.