Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 24 | Thanked: 4 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ Near Paris, France
#321
Nokia has done a good job with this leak : they gave us good pictures to make us interested but then they didn't give us much detailed technical info, thus keeping us wondering and generating more buzz ...
 

The Following User Says Thank You to pierro78 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,664 | Thanked: 1,530 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Hamilton, New Zealand
#322
Originally Posted by pierro78 View Post
Nokia has done a good job with this leak : they gave us good pictures to make us interested but then they didn't give us much detailed technical info, thus keeping us wondering and generating more buzz ...
Not sure what sort of buzz you experiencing though, I can hear BuzzLightyear next to my ears!!
 

The Following User Says Thank You to maxximuscool For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,664 | Thanked: 1,530 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Hamilton, New Zealand
#323
If (N9Hardware >= iPhone4Hardware) {
return true;
} else { return FAILED}
 
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#324
Originally Posted by maxximuscool View Post
If (N9Hardware >= iPhone4Hardware) {
return true;
} else { return FAILED}
If only that comparison would be possible. Considering the form factor of the phones is different it’s apple-to-orange land anyway.


Originally Posted by maxximuscool View Post
ng performance
* IVA™ 2+ (Image Video Audio) accelerator enables multi-standard (MPEG4, WMV9, RealVideo, H263, H264) encode/decode at D1 (720x480 pixels) 30 fps, and up to 720p resolutions

But where is the 720p decoder/encoder of the N900? clearly it support in the processor. Also the processor support 720p recording as well.. hmm.. now i'm wondering about the N900 lol
Read that back once again. It supports 720p but at what realistic fps and codecs ? It says 720x480 at 30fps, 720p is bound to be less fps (lot less). Only the higher-clocked 36xx SOCs boast prominently being able to play back 720p content.
__________________
Blogging about mobile linux - The Penguin Moves!
Maintainer of PyQt (see introduction and docs), AppWatch, QuickBrownFox, etc
 
Posts: 3,664 | Thanked: 1,530 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Hamilton, New Zealand
#325
Originally Posted by attila77 View Post
Only the higher-clocked 36xx SOCs boast prominently being able to play back 720p content.
I think not just 36XX take a look at OmniaHD as an example.
http://reviews.cnet.com/smartphones/...-33527298.html

http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i8910_omnia_hd-2691.php

It recording at 720p and play back because of AMOLED
This really show that N900 is somewhat capable of handling 720p if and only if the OS allowing it and having the right optimised codec.
I wandering why Nokia didn't take some risk in enabling it. Recording at 720 would be possible too, I believe I read somewhere about this that N900 can do 720 but will be on the edge and may be difficult to do it with its current OS.

But on the other hand Nokia can't even get the 848x480p to work properly already. I don't see they can get anything done with this at all. Even samsung can do it with almost identicle hardware lol this is terribly embarassing for me personally.

Last edited by maxximuscool; 2010-08-21 at 11:14.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to maxximuscool For This Useful Post:
Posts: 27 | Thanked: 7 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#326
no guys that will be a new version of the N8 ... i dont know where, but i red it before, that this IS NOT the meego phone...
 
NvyUs's Avatar
Posts: 1,885 | Thanked: 2,008 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ OVI MAPS
#327
Originally Posted by necoicould View Post
no guys that will be a new version of the N8 ... i dont know where, but i red it before, that this IS NOT the meego phone...
its a MeeGo phone look on the display in screenshots also it as N9 stamped in the metal body


heres the qwerty N8/E7 it as lot of differences to the N9

Last edited by NvyUs; 2010-08-21 at 11:44.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to NvyUs For This Useful Post:
Posts: 515 | Thanked: 266 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Oelsted, Denmark
#328
Looking good so far...

Guess I know what I'll be reading about until launch (deja vu?)...
__________________
Christian Wilken - tux-POWER.dk!
... May the Source be with You ...
 
cjp's Avatar
Posts: 762 | Thanked: 395 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Helsinki
#329
Okay I need to vent about this leak just a little bit:

- Why does it look so much like the N8? What could be the point behind making the next MeeGo device look like the cheaper Symbian powered device? Why not make the MeeGo device stand out, instead of making it look like "N8 with a keyboard"?

- The two devices will be in totally different price categories, with the MeeGo device in the 600+ euros and the N8 has its pre-order bs price at 499 euros. That 499 euros will soon translate into 399e special prices as stores actually get hold of the device and race to sell it at the cheapest price to attract the early adopters. Why would these two devices then be in two completely separate price categories and look almost identical? In Finland at least, the 5800XM was around 350-399euros once it came out.

- The N900 was marketed as a mobile computer. The same doesn't seem to happening for the N8. So why would this physical appearance be adopted to a device that aims to serve the needs of the true power users? Two devices, two different

EDIT: Okay while I typed this next bit became already discussed, but still I feel that it's not been sufficiently revealed:

- Why aren't we speculating if this is a (more advanced) prototype of this device? I mean doesn't that UI in there look a lot like Symbian^4? Why is this supposed to be a MeeGo device and not a S^4 device?
 

The Following User Says Thank You to cjp For This Useful Post:
Posts: 174 | Thanked: 69 times | Joined on Jun 2009
#330
Originally Posted by cjp View Post
Okay I need to vent about this leak just a little bit:

- Why does it look so much like the N8? What could be the point behind making the next MeeGo device look like the cheaper Symbian powered device? Why not make the MeeGo device stand out, instead of making it look like "N8 with a keyboard"?

- The two devices will be in totally different price categories, with the MeeGo device in the 600+ euros and the N8 has its pre-order bs price at 499 euros. That 499 euros will soon translate into 399e special prices as stores actually get hold of the device and race to sell it at the cheapest price to attract the early adopters. Why would these two devices then be in two completely separate price categories and look almost identical? In Finland at least, the 5800XM was around 350-399euros once it came out.

- The N900 was marketed as a mobile computer. The same doesn't seem to happening for the N8. So why would this physical appearance be adopted to a device that aims to serve the needs of the true power users? Two devices, two different

EDIT: Okay while I typed this next bit became already discussed, but still I feel that it's not been sufficiently revealed:

- Why aren't we speculating if this is a (more advanced) prototype of this device? I mean doesn't that UI in there look a lot like Symbian^4? Why is this supposed to be a MeeGo device and not a S^4 device?

BEcause N9 is KNOWN to be MEEGO DEVICE, hence its not Symbian 4.

Symbian 4 is pretty far off, sometime 2011 it is coming.

I think the hardware is amazing, and if all the top end is Aluminium casing its awesome.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to zfarooq For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
design, nokia n9

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:56.