![]() |
2010-11-26
, 01:10
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 2,622 |
Thanked: 5,447 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#22
|
Quick question...
Why cannot cellular frequency be used without cellular towers, in peer-to-peer style?
Like: you send SMS, it's regularly broadcasted to all phones within reach, they re-broadcast it regularly, it's received by the end recipient, it replies instantaneously with "Message X received, stop shouting", they broadcast messages "Message X received by the end recipient, stop shouting" to everybody, when sender receives this message, he knows that message is received and stops sending it.
It has large potential for an avalanche, but utilizes no costly cellular towers. If you send/receive messages rarely and place calls once in a month, the P2P network will be underused.
It works better when the density of phones is high enough to be reliable and low enough to prevent an avalanche.
The Following User Says Thank You to qwazix For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-11-26
, 03:20
|
Posts: 2,006 |
Thanked: 3,351 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ N900: Battery low. N950: torx 4 re-used once and fine; SIM port torn apart
|
#23
|
Quick question...
Why cannot cellular frequency be used without cellular towers, in peer-to-peer style?
Like: you send SMS, it's regularly broadcasted to all phones within reach, they re-broadcast it regularly, it's received by the end recipient, it replies instantaneously with "Message X received, stop shouting", they broadcast messages "Message X received by the end recipient, stop shouting" to everybody, when sender receives this message, he knows that message is received and stops sending it.
It has large potential for an avalanche, but utilizes no costly cellular towers. If you send/receive messages rarely and place calls once in a month, the P2P network will be underused.
It works better when the density of phones is high enough to be reliable and low enough to prevent an avalanche.
![]() |
2010-11-26
, 03:33
|
Posts: 671 |
Thanked: 1,630 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#24
|
Quick question...
Why cannot cellular frequency be used without cellular towers, in peer-to-peer style?
Like: you send SMS, it's regularly broadcasted to all phones within reach, they re-broadcast it regularly, it's received by the end recipient, it replies instantaneously with "Message X received, stop shouting", they broadcast messages "Message X received by the end recipient, stop shouting" to everybody, when sender receives this message, he knows that message is received and stops sending it.
It has large potential for an avalanche, but utilizes no costly cellular towers. If you send/receive messages rarely and place calls once in a month, the P2P network will be underused.
It works better when the density of phones is high enough to be reliable and low enough to prevent an avalanche.
That is the best idea I have seen in ages however im very sure that cellular transmission software in all mobiles is closed source
The Following User Says Thank You to theonelaw For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-11-26
, 04:23
|
Posts: 2,006 |
Thanked: 3,351 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ N900: Battery low. N950: torx 4 re-used once and fine; SIM port torn apart
|
#25
|
Really cool thought, but you need a population of phones with the
same code in them.
However, Your Truly Magnificent Idea leads to another thought,
just being able to send an SMS by itself would be brilliant,
because the problem with WiFi or Bluetooth is distance,
whereas the lower frequency GSM bands (800-900mhz)
have much more penetration than the higher ones (1800-1900mhz) and the FM transmitter is quite weak.
Sending an SMS across a couple of km without needing
a carrier to handle would be a killer app.
It would be a showstopper for network carriers.
You would see the n900 banned, outlawed, and people who
had it would need "carry permits".
Reason I am bumping this though is I have big problems maintaining
a massive wifi network through a very serious rainforest,
and the bottom line on NLOS data transfer is that wifi
can only do so much in the trees before the signal dies off.
We have places where we can get distant GSM signals with
handphones where our supercharged wifi systems working at
2400mhz with heaps of watts and focused beams cannot go.
I can park at a long distance in clear line of sight of one of our
towers and connect wirelessly over considerable distances,
but the helicopter time is too expensive.
It would be an amazing feat to get phones that could
transmit simple text messages over some distance,
through trees and other NLOS obstacles,
even if it were only point-to-point.
With a 6m limit on FM and 30m limit on Bluetooth,
the GSM radio would be the best way to go for peer-peer
handset communication.
However, if you could run a dual sim card and
somehow create a second sim card as a carrier-less account
and make it work on the low-frequency range,
then it becomes conceivable perhaps.
A sim card is merely an obstacle,
there are ways to triggger an sms once you have a channel set up,
I read it somewhere, it is in C if I remember correctly...
The Following User Says Thank You to Wikiwide For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-11-27
, 00:41
|
Posts: 2,006 |
Thanked: 3,351 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ N900: Battery low. N950: torx 4 re-used once and fine; SIM port torn apart
|
#26
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Wikiwide For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-11-27
, 02:10
|
Posts: 671 |
Thanked: 1,630 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#27
|
Quick reply...
Is it a possibility to send SMS through your own SMS centre bypassing normal service providers?
Conversations->Settings->SMS centre number
Maybe, you could set up laptop at home to receive SMS as SMS centre, and to send them through your PC Internet connection for free (you know, websites which allow you to send SMS for free). Then set SMS centre number in your N900 to laptop's number, and send SMS through Internet for free.
Or, if you are good at compiling, compile SMS centre at your N900 and set its number as SMS centre. Then N900 would use its own SMS centre and try to send SMS directly to any nearby (several kilometers) phone.
I just don't know. It's the strangest setting I have ever seen.
The Following User Says Thank You to theonelaw For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-11-27
, 03:09
|
Posts: 1,522 |
Thanked: 392 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ São Paulo, Brazil
|
#28
|
![]() |
2010-11-27
, 04:28
|
Posts: 2,006 |
Thanked: 3,351 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ N900: Battery low. N950: torx 4 re-used once and fine; SIM port torn apart
|
#29
|
A while ago, i think it was on the IRC channel, there was someone talking about how they had used a SIP server (i think it was running on a N900, though there might have been a laptop and/or a WiFi router involved) to call other SIP+WiFi enabled devices, i think this was done while camping, creating their own little SIP network while they were there.
I have been following your link to OpenBTS
and as I read it the phone radio firmware is probably locked
into needing a BTS to camp on.
The open BTS way sounds completely workable though.
As the radio firmware is probably one of Nokia's darkest secrets
it may be impossible to find a way to actually drive the radio
to to call/sms another radio without going through a BTS.
Just guessing - never really studied GSM before this.
The Following User Says Thank You to Wikiwide For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-11-27
, 06:19
|
Posts: 671 |
Thanked: 1,630 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#30
|
A while ago, i think it was on the IRC channel, there was someone talking about how they had used a SIP server (i think it was running on a N900, though there might have been a laptop and/or a WiFi router involved) to call other SIP+WiFi enabled devices, i think this was done while camping, creating their own little SIP network while they were there.
The Following User Says Thank You to theonelaw For This Useful Post: | ||
I'm not the first to offer it, Wikipedia says:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TerraNet_AB
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6987784.stm
Year 2007.
What is with it now?
There are only TerraNet test networks in operation today. There is at least one commercial implementation planned during 2008, and we will publish more information here on TNMC at a later date.
There are no productified handsets available ‘on the shelf’ or in production at this time. The technology itself is developed, demonstrated in a laboratory environment and in test networks, and is already included in implementation projects that are scheduled for completion in 2008.
Congestion, or traffic overload, can happen in any mobile phone network where the use of the network is excessive, or where the network is not scaled to fit the amount of users. There is of course a limitation as regards the data flow in each TerraNet handset. The TerraNet technology strives to distribute the traffic over the full network to minimizing the risk of congestion, by e.g. using TerraNet HelperNodes to offload the handsets’ load of forwarding.
The latest news:
2009-09-01
But, the site it alive, therefore they continue to pay for it, therefore they continue to work.
Mobile phone manufacturer Ericsson had invested around £3m in TerraNet around 2007.
Panda Electronics
http://www.panda.cn/SJTCMS/html/pand...4967040601.asp