![]() |
2010-05-01
, 17:25
|
Posts: 1,400 |
Thanked: 3,751 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Arctic cold of northern .fi
|
#3472
|
Hey, Rauha. Can you knock @ nokia office and see what they are doing there. Maybe wake them up?
![]() |
2010-05-01
, 17:26
|
|
Posts: 7,075 |
Thanked: 9,073 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#3473
|
Sorry but it is the Walpurgis night + Labour Day combo weekend.
I'm drunk, I'm pretty sure that everybody who works for Nokia is drunk and well....have to go drink some more.
![]() |
2010-05-01
, 17:32
|
Posts: 472 |
Thanked: 442 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
|
#3474
|
If PR1.2 ever releases on monday, you'll all be very short of 4000 posts. Go on, post nonsense faster, I know you can do it !
That was my participation
(BTW Laughingstok I like the photos you posted, but are they really taken with an n900 ?)
![]() |
2010-05-01
, 17:42
|
Posts: 277 |
Thanked: 46 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#3475
|
![]() |
2010-05-01
, 17:47
|
|
Posts: 146 |
Thanked: 119 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Spain
|
#3476
|
Yep. Should be able to check the data on them if you dont believe it (not sure why you wouldnt)
![]() |
2010-05-01
, 17:51
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#3477
|
Second, there is a huge difference between preloading a firmware in the factory and making it available for seamless OTA update. (Update being the crucial one - like not destroying your existing data and apps, right?)
Third, I couldn't find any proof that the Chinese PR1.2 is the same as the regular PR1.2 for us. They might needed to create a separate branch to quickly rush handwriting support and char support stuff in there.
Yes, I want the PR1.2 also. But I don't want to blame Nokia for a supposed PR1.2 running on the Chinese release.
I'm sorry but what COULD change the device is actual support from developers. What I've seen so far is the usual Nokia lapdogs(Offscreen) + maybe Shazam. Bringing QT doesn't magically bring tons of great apps, there has to actually be some interest for the platforms from developers, and I really haven't seen anything so far to think something would actually change.
WHat's frustrating to me with this whole PR 1.2 discussion is not so much when it will be released, but rather the fact we have these large monolithic releases at all.
For all the openness around maemo development we don't have what we get on desktop linux distros -- ie all capability packaged, regular updates, and a variety of repositories to reflect different needs (ie stable/beta/development)
I hope this will improve in meego -- and of course it's also right to expect updates to be bundled carefully for the stable channel, whilst beta and esp development can be more dynamic/use at own risk.
And cruicially making individual packages available would allow affected users to get hold of very specific fixes they need (for example I'm waiting for a certificate manager fix to address a wireless eap-tls issue) promptly .
Let's hope this changes and this whole "PR" discussion becomes irrelevant in future.,
![]() |
2010-05-01
, 18:08
|
|
Posts: 876 |
Thanked: 396 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#3478
|
![]() |
2010-05-01
, 18:10
|
Posts: 472 |
Thanked: 442 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
|
#3479
|
Can we nominate her to the council like "divine inspiration of maemo.org"?
Is she real or a Maya-rendered Godness?
![]() |
2010-05-01
, 18:12
|
Posts: 472 |
Thanked: 442 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
|
#3480
|
Probably you guys should get a life and get drunk as well
Then you'd be less worried about PR
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
Place your bets!