The Following User Says Thank You to jsa For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-04-22
, 16:44
|
Posts: 51 |
Thanked: 22 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#32
|
![]() |
2010-04-22
, 16:51
|
Posts: 145 |
Thanked: 237 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Helsinki
|
#33
|
Overall sales in Europe (their main market) are broadly in line with inflation and overall sales are up by 16%. So until Apple start selling in china (oh wait that will never happen as they are way to expensive!) Nokia have some captive markets
Their bad performance in North America affects their image in the English speaking web/press which I think is kind of contagious on this side of the pond too. I've been thinking about what they need to do to get some buzz going and I thought I'd never say this but they need carrier support from a major American operator.
I am not being alarmist. It isn't even just about apps. The N900 will not carry Nokia's image much longer, and image is critical. It doesn't matter if they can dominate the low to mid end, because the media will hate them as long as they don't have an "iPhone". It'll suddenly be uncool to have any kind of Nokia, and people will flock to Samsung.
![]() |
2010-04-22
, 16:54
|
Posts: 51 |
Thanked: 22 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#34
|
![]() |
2010-04-22
, 16:54
|
Posts: 145 |
Thanked: 237 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Helsinki
|
#35
|
![]() |
2010-04-22
, 16:57
|
Posts: 145 |
Thanked: 237 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Helsinki
|
#37
|
Why would people flock to samsung - they don't have an iphone (or good press) either
![]() |
2010-04-22
, 16:59
|
Posts: 51 |
Thanked: 22 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#38
|
![]() |
2010-04-22
, 17:22
|
Posts: 289 |
Thanked: 560 times |
Joined on May 2009
@ Tampere, Finland
|
#39
|
Symbian^4 has been hyped up a lot, but after reading the roadmaps I'm not so convinced of it. Symbian^3, if it lives up to promises, will get 95% there.
![]() |
2010-04-22
, 17:38
|
Posts: 1,400 |
Thanked: 3,751 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Arctic cold of northern .fi
|
#40
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Rauha For This Useful Post: | ||
Samsung and LG are very tough in the midrange TS phones where Nokia is expanding and the cheapo Chinese phones are eating their lowest end.
Their bad performance in North America affects their image in the English speaking web/press which I think is kind of contagious on this side of the pond too. I've been thinking about what they need to do to get some buzz going and I thought I'd never say this but they need carrier support from a major American operator. It seems to me that getting a high end model to an American carrier is kind of a "seal of approval" for the US tech blogs and buyers. The carrier flagship phones, iPhone, Droid, Pre etc. seem to get an enormous amount of exposure. Obviously that's futile if there aren't competitive devices, which again I don't see before Harmattan or S^4.
Addition: I think the brand still has quite a lot of power. Long time Nokia users looking for high end products are frustrated because Nokia doesn't have much to offer and are moving to alternatives. But I also think if and when Nokia gets something really competitive out the brand helps a lot in converting those people back.
Last edited by jsa; 2010-04-22 at 16:50.