Reply
Thread Tools
cfh11's Avatar
Posts: 1,062 | Thanked: 961 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Boston, MA
#31
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
@ToJa92: I doubt they're that daft.
Plus, this will be consistent with their track-record of one-upping iphone's specs.
Looks like they are that daft.

http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/17/t...al-on-verizon/

haha... FAIL
__________________
Want to browse streamlined versions of websites automatically when in 2g? Vote for this brainstorm.

Sick of your cell signal not reconnecting after coming out of a bad signal area? Vote for this bug.
 
ysss's Avatar
Posts: 4,384 | Thanked: 5,524 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
#32
lol idiots..

I must start to underestimate people more often, it doesn't pay to pay undue respect to them
__________________
Class .. : Power User
Humor .. : [#####-----] | Alignment: Pragmatist
Patience : [###-------] | Weapon(s): Galaxy Note + BB Bold Touch 9900
Agro ... : [###-------] | Relic(s) : iPhone 4S, Atrix, Milestone, N900, N800, N95, HTC G1, Treos, Zauri, BB 9000, BB 9700, etc

Follow the MeeGo Coding Competition!
 
cfh11's Avatar
Posts: 1,062 | Thanked: 961 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Boston, MA
#33
Yeah always set the bar low I say - its that much harder to get disappointed and that much easier to be impressed!
__________________
Want to browse streamlined versions of websites automatically when in 2g? Vote for this brainstorm.

Sick of your cell signal not reconnecting after coming out of a bad signal area? Vote for this bug.
 
Posts: 307 | Thanked: 157 times | Joined on Jul 2009 @ Illinois, USA
#34
Originally Posted by bxbomber View Post
Why yes I do live in the US and most everyone I know has a belt clip.
I'm to assume it's not a European thing then?
Its not an American thing either. It is NOT acceptable fashion to wear your phone on your belt.

Other Americans think you are just as big a douchebag/idiot as our European counterparts do.

This is coming from one American to another.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to mmurfin87 For This Useful Post:
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#35
hrmf, why did google make phone a required element of getting compatibility approval for pre-2.1? i would like to see a about 5" android device (but that can access marketplace and certain other stuff) without the added cost of the phone, as i have a nicely working phone thank you very much.

still, these devices are heading towards whats been talked about in sci-fi for some time.
__________________
Be warned, posts are often line of thoughts at highway speeds...
 
Posts: 1,667 | Thanked: 561 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#36
Originally Posted by tso View Post
hrmf, why did google make phone a required element of getting compatibility approval for pre-2.1? i would like to see a about 5" android device (but that can access marketplace and certain other stuff) without the added cost of the phone, as i have a nicely working phone thank you very much.

still, these devices are heading towards whats been talked about in sci-fi for some time.
Google didn't make it. Motorola did
 
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#37
Originally Posted by nosa101 View Post
Google didn't make it. Motorola did
but google have the compatibility requirements for access to marketplace and google services. And so they have a say in what kind of device gets made (unless one feel like having a chinese pmp that basically uses android as a marketing buzzword for their underpowered hardware).
__________________
Be warned, posts are often line of thoughts at highway speeds...
 
Posts: 1,667 | Thanked: 561 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#38
Originally Posted by tso View Post
but google have the compatibility requirements for access to marketplace and google services. And so they have a say in what kind of device gets made (unless one feel like having a chinese pmp that basically uses android as a marketing buzzword for their underpowered hardware).
Yeah but Google can't stop them from making a phone that isn't compatible with 2.2
 
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#39
Originally Posted by nosa101 View Post
Yeah but Google can't stop them from making a phone that isn't compatible with 2.2
while true, the lack of market or google services apps would be a near death sentence. Especially as many high profile android apps are only available via marketplace.
__________________
Be warned, posts are often line of thoughts at highway speeds...
 
Posts: 650 | Thanked: 619 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#40
Originally Posted by cfh11 View Post
According to engadget the prototype had the same 854 x 480 display as the Droid... but of course that was just a prototype
When I played with Droid X, there was a Nexus One nearby and I thought the resolution looked similar. Except for the brightness and size, I couldn't tell any difference in resolution compared with N900's screen.

But since the screen is much bigger than N900's, the resolution could indeed be a step higher.
 
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:27.