![]() |
2010-09-18
, 19:24
|
Posts: 228 |
Thanked: 145 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#61
|
![]() |
2010-09-18
, 19:39
|
|
Posts: 2,535 |
Thanked: 6,681 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ UK
|
#62
|
Sadly if Meego is to be one day a mainstream OS..this is a necessary requirement. Most people (ie. not techies) don't want to search for dependencies. Heck most of them don't even know how to, let alone solve conflicts that may arise due to these dependencies.
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Jaffa For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-09-18
, 20:34
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#63
|
![]() |
2010-09-18
, 22:13
|
|
Posts: 2,535 |
Thanked: 6,681 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ UK
|
#64
|
This was posted to maemo-community minutes ago by Robin Burchell/w00t (was asked by him to repost as his network is bad):
It was pointed out by a close friend of mine that I hadn't declared this when I stood, so I consulted Dave this afternoon about this issue, and as a result, my candidacy has been removed from consideration - I am no longer in the running as a candidate, and any votes I recieve will automatically be transferred to the next. (I don't know the full details of how this works. Dave?)
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 02:29
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#65
|
A decision will be made by the Community Council (excluding Attila and myself) and/or Quim.
The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 03:18
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#66
|
My understanding of what traits would be necessary of a candidate for the next council term are:
The Following User Says Thank You to allnameswereout For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 03:35
|
Posts: 5,335 |
Thanked: 8,187 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Pennsylvania, USA
|
#67
|
I've already cast my vote, but I'd like to hear the remaining candidates' views on the current MeeGo compliance spec draft (specifically the "no non-core dependencies allowed" rule discussed from this point onwards).
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 03:47
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#68
|
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 08:40
|
|
Posts: 2,173 |
Thanked: 2,678 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Cornwall, UK
|
#69
|
I've already cast my vote, but I'd like to hear the remaining candidates' views on the current MeeGo compliance spec draft (specifically the "no non-core dependencies allowed" rule discussed from this point onwards).
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 08:55
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#70
|
My approach were I on the council would be to endeavour to understand the principle, if not the details, and then seek the will of the community. Then it would be my job to promote that to the best of my ability.