Active Topics
-
Camera phone competition March 2023 "Endless" (35)
to General by Maemish - 1 day, 8 hrs ago -
TLS 1.2 for N9 is ready (28)
to MeeGo / Harmattan by smartblu9 - 1 day, 9 hrs ago -
Maemo repository (3)
to Community by torsen - 2 days, 1 hr ago -
Error after installing Leste on sdcard (11)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Maemish - 2 days, 22 hrs ago -
Introducing ubiboot N9 (multiboot OS loader) (1,393)
to Alternatives by smatkovi - 4 days, 5 hrs ago - more...
| The Following User Says Thank You to qnetman For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2011-06-17
, 20:18
|
|
Posts: 64 |
Thanked: 140 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#52
|
Originally Posted by fasza2
No, not only for removal. By selecting a few sessions, you can calculate the total network traffic for these sessions
In the sessions window is the select function there only to delete multiple sessions?
Originally Posted by fasza2
If I understand correctly, then you have to offer to record for several interfaces at once? Start recording on multiple network interfaces, and will be the desired result. But you will get different session from the list of saved sessions. For each network interface has its own record
I could imagine a battery-eye like graph to display muliple or even all sessions. In fact if there is any way to detect wether an interface is in use to automate the recording. Or to have the daemon running all times. Opt-in of course so that user can decide it on demand. You already got a database time limit option, which would be extremly useful if all data was recorded.
Originally Posted by fasza2
Yes, I have been thinking about this idea. This is not difficult.
Another, probably much simpler idea is to allow user to tag sessions so that user can tell what applications were running or why the session is relevant to user. Keeping time and date ofc not replaceing it. Would be useful for sessions recorded weeks, months or years before viewing.
 |
|
2011-06-17
, 20:28
|
|
Posts: 187 |
Thanked: 96 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ London, UK
|
#53
|
Originally Posted by qnetman
Try that, btw have you got a VM to check how it would work on a fresh PR1.3 image? Im not quite ready to flash my N900 just yet
It will be necessary to include the package in dependency to the program
|
|
2011-06-17
, 20:44
|
|
Posts: 64 |
Thanked: 140 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#54
|
Originally Posted by fasza2
firmware version you have installed now?
Try that, btw have you got a VM to check how it would work on a fresh PR1.3 image? Im not quite ready to flash my N900 just yet
|
|
2011-06-17
, 20:50
|
|
Posts: 187 |
Thanked: 96 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ London, UK
|
#55
|
Originally Posted by qnetman
Yeah, I found it just right after posting.
No, not only for removal. By selecting a few sessions, you can calculate the total network traffic for these sessions
Originally Posted by qnetman
Yes, all interfaces continuesly saving to a different database, each interface with seperate entries. Then imorting data to a graph much like battery-eye. To see overall usage pattern. I would keep the current session recording part as it is extremly useful to see how particular apps or set of apps using data. This isn't really a neccesity, but it could be a nice extention for the widget.
If I understand correctly, then you have to offer to record for several interfaces at once? Start recording on multiple network interfaces, and will be the desired result. But you will get different session from the list of saved sessions. For each network interface has its own record
Last edited by fasza2; 2011-06-17 at 20:52.
|
|
2011-06-17
, 20:51
|
|
Posts: 187 |
Thanked: 96 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ London, UK
|
#56
|
Yes I have PR 1.3 global
|
|
2011-06-19
, 21:06
|
|
Posts: 64 |
Thanked: 140 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#57
|
A new version of QNetMan-0.5.8 (0.5.8 in extras-devel and 0.4.5 in extras-testing)
Screenshots:
Changes:
- add a comment to network sessions
- control of recording of data directly from the widget (thanks fasza2 )
- splashscreen replaced pvr-file
- аfter installing py_compilefiles used to accelerate the application
- fixed autostart daemon
Screenshots:
Changes:
- add a comment to network sessions
- control of recording of data directly from the widget (thanks fasza2
)- splashscreen replaced pvr-file
- аfter installing py_compilefiles used to accelerate the application
- fixed autostart daemon
|
|
2011-06-23
, 02:04
|
|
Posts: 187 |
Thanked: 96 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ London, UK
|
#58
|
Recording with widget works like a charm.
The comment part is a nice new feature, however It would be better to see it or at least part of it right from the sessions screen so that user doesn't have to press view in order to see it(possibily multiple times). It would be nice to see it right above or below the date/time especially when date/time is irrelevant to user.
Looking good so far. Any news on the dependencies front?
PS: Love the transition on the bottom of 'about' screen. Nice work so far.
The comment part is a nice new feature, however It would be better to see it or at least part of it right from the sessions screen so that user doesn't have to press view in order to see it(possibily multiple times). It would be nice to see it right above or below the date/time especially when date/time is irrelevant to user.
Looking good so far. Any news on the dependencies front?
PS: Love the transition on the bottom of 'about' screen. Nice work so far.
| The Following User Says Thank You to fasza2 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-06-23
, 15:37
|
|
Posts: 64 |
Thanked: 140 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#59
|
Originally Posted by fasza2
Good idea, but area to draw comments in a row is very small. Have to think how to do it.
The comment part is a nice new feature, however It would be better to see it or at least part of it right from the sessions screen so that user doesn't have to press view in order to see it(possibily multiple times). It would be nice to see it right above or below the date/time especially when date/time is irrelevant to user.
Originally Posted by fasza2
However, I do not like the design of the widget, I want to remake it, but do not know how
Recording with widget works like a charm.
Originally Posted by fasza2
Depending on the package include a library libpyside1.0 Although this library should be automatically updated when the updated packages that depend on it
Looking good so far. Any news on the dependencies front?
|
|
2011-06-23
, 21:16
|
|
Posts: 187 |
Thanked: 96 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ London, UK
|
#60
|
Originally Posted by qnetman
I am quite happy with it, simple and fit for purpouse. What sort of thing are you not happy with? What directions do you wan to take?
However, I do not like the design of the widget, I want to remake it, but do not know how
Originally Posted by qnetman
Indeed, but you can't expect 'end users' to fix that manually using the command line, even if the command is as simple as apt-get upgrade libpyside. It has to work out of the box if your package is to be in extras. Using the command line to fix such issues is fine in devel even in testing, but it will not likely make it to extras, even if the package works good after the fix.I am affraid you'll have to figure out something regarding this. However, as soon as it's fixed you got my vote
Depending on the package include a library libpyside1.0 Although this library should be automatically updated when the updated packages that depend on it
Solving the problem here
ie as root run the command
apt-get upgrade libpyside
I do not understand why this happens, the package python-pyside.qtcore (1.0.2-1maemo3) depends on the package libpyside1.0 (1.0.3-1maemo2)
Why not fulfilled dependency
It will be necessary to include the package in dependency to the program