Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
qgil's Avatar
Posts: 3,105 | Thanked: 11,088 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ Mountain View (CA, USA)
#291
Hi, have you considered asking/discussing at #meego-arm, the meego-handset mailing list of forum.meego.com and work closer to the MeeGo Community Edition team?
 

The Following User Says Thank You to qgil For This Useful Post:
Posts: 94 | Thanked: 28 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#292
Originally Posted by qgil View Post
Hi, have you considered asking/discussing at #meego-arm, the meego-handset mailing list of forum.meego.com and work closer to the MeeGo Community Edition team?
I'm on the #meego-arm channel but I'm not too sure if discussing this on MeeGo forums is a really good idea. I tried discussing Aegis/MSSF on meego-security-discussion list and I was pointed at the fact that MSSF wasn't in MeeGo and that the N9 wasn't running MeeGo at all and that calling it that way would only add more confusion.

Any advice appreciated
 
qgil's Avatar
Posts: 3,105 | Thanked: 11,088 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ Mountain View (CA, USA)
#293
This is why I'm suggesting you to ask & discuss in the surrounds of the MeeGo CE project.

My main point however is that I keep seeing here this background tone of 'why Nokia has done this', 'how that is supposed to work', etc, when in fact there might be more than a couple of Nokia engineers interested in your work and happy to give you tips to progress further.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to qgil For This Useful Post:
Posts: 94 | Thanked: 28 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#294
Originally Posted by qgil View Post
This is why I'm suggesting you to ask & discuss in the surrounds of the MeeGo CE project.

My main point however is that I keep seeing here this background tone of 'why Nokia has done this', 'how that is supposed to work', etc, when in fact there might be more than a couple of Nokia engineers interested in your work and happy to give you tips to progress further.
Yeah, to be fair I had very friendly answers to my questions on meego-security-discussionm, both from Nokia and Intel people. But Intel people are concerned about confusion between MeeGo 1.2 and MeeGo 1.2 Harmattan (which, I guess, is fair). And I'm sure there are a lot of friendly people on the other channels, but I just don't want to bother people by asking those questions on the wrong channels.
 
Posts: 176 | Thanked: 190 times | Joined on Jun 2011 @ Italy
#295
Originally Posted by corsac View Post
Yeah, to be fair I had very friendly answers to my questions on meego-security-discussionm, both from Nokia and Intel people. But Intel people are concerned about confusion between MeeGo 1.2 and MeeGo 1.2 Harmattan (which, I guess, is fair). And I'm sure there are a lot of friendly people on the other channels, but I just don't want to bother people by asking those questions on the wrong channels.
Any good news about this porting ?
 
Posts: 94 | Thanked: 28 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#296
Originally Posted by blackjack4it View Post
Any good news about this porting ?
Hmhm, sorry to disappoint you but my efforts aren't at all related to porting Harmattan to N900, it's more to examine and analyze the rootfs.
 
Posts: 176 | Thanked: 190 times | Joined on Jun 2011 @ Italy
#297
Originally Posted by corsac View Post
Hmhm, sorry to disappoint you but my efforts aren't at all related to porting Harmattan to N900, it's more to examine and analyze the rootfs.
Sigh & Sob don't worry, your "discovery mission" will help the porting

Any news about?
 
Posts: 1,225 | Thanked: 1,905 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ Quezon City, Philippines
#298
Originally Posted by blackjack4it View Post
Sigh & Sob don't worry, your "discovery mission" will help the porting

Any news about?
Still nothing on unpacking the image.
If it does get unpacked, I'll try to use it with the MeeGo 2.6.37 kernel.
__________________
N9 PR 1.3 Open Mode + kernel-plus for Harmattan
@kenweknot, working on Glacier for Nemo.
 
Posts: 2,802 | Thanked: 4,491 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#299
Originally Posted by Hurrian View Post
Still nothing on unpacking the image.
If it does get unpacked, I'll try to use it with the MeeGo 2.6.37 kernel.
Harmattan is 2.6.32, so I suspect that would be about as succesful as running Fremantle userland on that 2.6.37 :-/
 
Posts: 1,225 | Thanked: 1,905 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ Quezon City, Philippines
#300
Originally Posted by lma View Post
Harmattan is 2.6.32, so I suspect that would be about as succesful as running Fremantle userland on that 2.6.37 :-/
That is, if Nokia... does a Nokia and makes things depend on kernel interfaces removed from 2.6.37 - which there are very few that I know of, and mostly relate to Linux's graphics performance (lol)
__________________
N9 PR 1.3 Open Mode + kernel-plus for Harmattan
@kenweknot, working on Glacier for Nemo.
 
Reply

Tags
harmattan, meego


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:17.