|
2011-09-17
, 19:59
|
|
Posts: 7,074 |
Thanked: 9,069 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#6102
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dave999 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-09-17
, 20:32
|
Posts: 572 |
Thanked: 259 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
|
#6103
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jo21 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-09-17
, 21:13
|
Posts: 55 |
Thanked: 140 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
@ Switzerland
|
#6104
|
well final date should have been announced by now.
i mean... later developed outsourced belle its done, (or getting released without much test)
n950 felt nice, n9 SHOULD be complete.
|
2011-09-17
, 21:29
|
|
Posts: 95 |
Thanked: 166 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#6105
|
I think we all agree that we would like the N9 to be available by now, but even all of us combined (*) probably do not have enough relevant information and insight as to know when it should be considered ready for the launch...
I'd prefer to have it a bit later than half-baked.
|
2011-09-17
, 21:49
|
Posts: 55 |
Thanked: 140 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
@ Switzerland
|
#6106
|
That is true. However, informed customer is happy customer. I would like to know date of public availability. It's too damn hard to wait so long. Announcement took ages to happen and now another endless wait? If Nokia make a statement now that I will be able to buy N9 on 27.10.2011 I would be a happy guy! But if I had to wait until that day without any information, that would be just too cruel... Silence is bad. Really really bad.
|
2011-09-17
, 22:05
|
Posts: 34 |
Thanked: 62 times |
Joined on Aug 2011
|
#6107
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to pedroesteban For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-09-17
, 22:19
|
Posts: 34 |
Thanked: 62 times |
Joined on Aug 2011
|
#6108
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to pedroesteban For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-09-17
, 22:26
|
|
Posts: 95 |
Thanked: 166 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#6109
|
I understand your point. On another hand, I also understand that Nokia would rather wait until they can be sure about a precise date, just a few weeks in the future, then announce it and stick to it.
If they'd announced a precise date 2-3 months in advance and could not stick to it for any reason (the industrial process for those gorgeous polycabonate shells, for example, must be a pretty harsh one to fine-tune and optimize...), I'd guess this would have generated some heat among impatient fans...
Furthermore, the general strategy seems to be incremental availability, by region, rather than a simultaneous worldwide availability. That must make sense from a logistic point of view...
|
2011-09-17
, 22:37
|
Posts: 55 |
Thanked: 140 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
@ Switzerland
|
#6110
|
Nokia is known for not keeping promises (e.g. N8) and Elop wants to shake off that reputation, hence the silence. But that's only my speculation.
Incremental availability from a logistic point of view makes perfect sense. But one thing should be clarified - price. If they have any reason for delay the device, price should be the same no matter what, no? So why not announce that? I know that Nokia Finland did, but why not other countries?
Tags |
disapoint, eflop, epic win!, laggy interface, n9 rox, so much win, wateriswet, who cares, whyyyyy?????? |
|
Last edited by jalyst; 2011-09-17 at 19:25.