The Following 35 Users Say Thank You to SD69 For This Useful Post: | ||
AapoRantalainen, acrux, Andre Klapper, anthonie, corduroysack, demolition, freemangordon, fw190, geneven, HtheB, int_ua, ivgalvez, Joseph9560, kent_autistic, m750, MartinK, marxian, misterc, mrsellout, nicolai, nkirk, OVK, panjgoori, patemera, pelago, peterleinchen, pycage, rcolistete, rotoflex, sixwheeledbeast, smoothc, strange1712, The Wizard of Huz, vetsin, Wikiwide |
![]() |
2012-02-16
, 14:03
|
Posts: 3,074 |
Thanked: 12,964 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Sofia,Bulgaria
|
#3
|
The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-02-16
, 14:16
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 3,718 |
Thanked: 7,420 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bize Her Yer Trabzon
|
#4
|
The problems I see with the nominees is that they are:
1. developers, so instead of coding they have to do QA
2. part of CSSU team and KP (AIUI the most important comminity projects by now), again, instead of coding/maintaining CSSU and KP they have to do QA.
It will be much better if we have other QA people nominated too. And there are good candidates for QA team, look at the adeclock thread or replacement media player thread (for example).
The Following User Says Thank You to HtheB For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-02-16
, 14:28
|
Posts: 244 |
Thanked: 354 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Scotland
|
#5
|
![]() |
2012-02-16
, 14:42
|
Posts: 1,163 |
Thanked: 1,873 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ The Netherlands
|
#6
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to mr_pingu For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-02-16
, 14:44
|
Posts: 1,397 |
Thanked: 2,126 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Dublin, Ireland
|
#7
|
![]() |
2012-02-16
, 16:26
|
Posts: 569 |
Thanked: 462 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ USA
|
#8
|
![]() |
2012-02-16
, 16:37
|
Posts: 560 |
Thanked: 422 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#9
|
![]() |
2012-02-16
, 16:58
|
Posts: 560 |
Thanked: 422 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#10
|
gregoranderson: there is a Quality Control procedure somewhere in the wikiswamp, but some of its criteria are assessments of issues not immediately understood or handily measured by casual users - optification, battery consumption, etc.
This is a crucial function which is currently suffering because the list of supertesters and promotion rules have not been updated in a long time. http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/mae...ry/028825.html
https://garage.maemo.org/projects/qatesters/
Of the current list, I propose to keep Andre Klapper and Harald Schmitt because they continue to be involved. If anyone has been involved and I missed it, please speak up. I'm sorry and you will be kept as well.
For new supertesters, we should have people who have a demonstrated interest in maemo and ability to test maemo packages. It is vital that supertesters are trusted members of the community. A single supertester will be able to promote someone else's (not their own) package. Please feel free to suggest different or more objective criteria for supertesters.
So far the following have been nominated:
Pali
freemangordon
nicolai
merlin19xx
MAG
3-time Maemo Community Council Member
Co-Founder, Hildon Foundation
Last edited by SD69; 2012-02-27 at 12:22.