The Following User Says Thank You to specc For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-03-06
, 23:59
|
Posts: 179 |
Thanked: 108 times |
Joined on Dec 2011
@ Bangalore
|
#82
|
The Following User Says Thank You to danested For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-03-07
, 00:09
|
Posts: 179 |
Thanked: 108 times |
Joined on Dec 2011
@ Bangalore
|
#83
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to danested For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-03-07
, 00:32
|
Posts: 246 |
Thanked: 70 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
|
#84
|
![]() |
2012-03-07
, 08:07
|
Posts: 66 |
Thanked: 57 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
@ Pretoria, South Africa
|
#85
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Nosph3ratu For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-03-07
, 08:33
|
|
Posts: 187 |
Thanked: 143 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
|
#86
|
If you haven't the seen the peeling for yourselves how can you say these devices are fake? I find it highly implausible that Nokia PR would use fake devices to demo to the public. The black is painted/coated.
I guess you guys took the blue pill and woke up in your bed and believed whatever you wanted to believe
![]() |
2012-03-07
, 08:43
|
Posts: 66 |
Thanked: 57 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
@ Pretoria, South Africa
|
#87
|
I'm sorry but you are actually reeeeetarded for saying that. Nokia employees (including the person who designed the polycarbonate) have stated countless times it's coloured all the way through. People on this forum have stated that they're scratched/chipped the phone, with the phone still displaying the same colour throughout the scratches
![]() |
2012-03-07
, 21:37
|
Posts: 323 |
Thanked: 209 times |
Joined on Oct 2011
@ Tampico, México
|
#89
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dcastrog For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-03-10
, 02:07
|
|
Posts: 28 |
Thanked: 26 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Mauritius
|
#90
|
The Following User Says Thank You to cm6 For This Useful Post: | ||
Possibilities:
1. It is painted
2. It is fake
3. The surface is processed in some way, but not necessarily painted.
4. one and two
5. Chemical contamination.
6. Bad batches has found their way to the market (more or less 2)
IMO number 4 is most reasonable. I mean it is well known that the N9 is not sold in US, UK and so on, yet the demand is large. Lots of "original replacement parts" can be found on the net. For outlets it is not particularly difficult to mix in non-original parts, and the risk is close to nothing. The internals are original (most of it), but the housing, buttons and so on can be fake.
Number 3 is also plausible. Surface processing is a normal procedure for outdoor optical PC lenses (car head lights mostly). They will seldom brake or crack, but they are hardened to prevent scratches. Gorilla glass - same stuff. This can be combined with 6. This kind of surface processing may also include matting of certain areas for wanted optical effects.
The least speculative, the most reasonable explanation is 4. Therefore it most like is the truth.