|
2012-07-18
, 17:31
|
|
Posts: 7,074 |
Thanked: 9,069 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#2
|
|
2012-07-18
, 18:09
|
|
Posts: 1,625 |
Thanked: 998 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#3
|
|
2012-07-18
, 18:15
|
Posts: 78 |
Thanked: 28 times |
Joined on Apr 2012
@ Curitiba-PR . Brasil
|
#4
|
|
2012-07-18
, 18:19
|
|
Posts: 1,625 |
Thanked: 998 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#5
|
-
-
why the N9 is a whitefly with one blue eye and one green ...a rarity
-
|
2012-07-18
, 18:30
|
|
Posts: 1,839 |
Thanked: 2,432 times |
Joined on May 2009
|
#6
|
let's be honest here, shall we?
Maemo (MeeGo blabla...) never was profitable
N9 may have scratched it if it had been marketed aggressively enough, indeed, certainly with Nitdroid, but... how would that have looked, claiming they don't want to become another "Android OEM" maker and having (one of) their most successful device of the moment... mostly be used under Android
without Flop / Fart's burning hara-kiri NOKIA would have been able to go on supporting Maemo
the only reason Android is so successful is because it is so open.
the only reason i can be so open is because Google can afford to give it away.
again see opening remark, no way a startup will be able to sustain that business model.
period
end of discussion
end of dream...
open source is not a viable business model
never has been, never will be.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tissot For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-07-18
, 18:58
|
Posts: 1,400 |
Thanked: 3,751 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Arctic cold of northern .fi
|
#7
|
|
2012-07-18
, 19:01
|
|
Posts: 1,625 |
Thanked: 998 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#8
|
I agree with the open source not being viable business model.
Though there was comment from Jolla that more than 200 000 phones would keep them alive, i don't see that impossible if the product will be actually good
What gives me some hope about Jolla is that these people at least seem to understand the market and know what it needs to get phone out to the market.
Proof of that would be if they truly could release device before years end, something that would be quite mind boggling for company like this.
If they can nurse the economy, community and can actually give us something amazing they might have niche covered. There's some truth on what the CEO said that the hardware is easy these days as most of the manufacturers just go shopping for the chips.
Jolla wont of course ever have things like PureView or custom chips like Samsung.
|
2012-07-18
, 19:01
|
|
Posts: 1,625 |
Thanked: 998 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#9
|
The orginal Jolla thread has already degenarated into 100 or pages about the same matter. Lively discussion about semantics of few words in interviews, both fanboism and hatred before any product and the whole nine yards of convoluted interwebs miscommunication.
No need for a new thread.
|
2012-07-18
, 19:24
|
Posts: 1,141 |
Thanked: 781 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Magical Unicorn Land
|
#10
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to stlpaul For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
jolla, misunderstand, notespecsorgtfo, note_spec_only, open_ur_speccs, specc is the, troll ericsson, typical_specc |
|
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/36...ngry-birds.htm
"Impossible is not in the Maemo vocabulary" - Caballero