Page 1 of 2 1 2
Reply
Thread Tools
marmistrz is offline marmistrz
2012-08-15 , 13:48
Posts: 3,328 | Thanked: 4,476 times | Joined on May 2011 @ Poland
#1
Hi,
I uploaded automake 1.11 today and I'm experiencing some stragne problem:
https://garage.maemo.org/builder/fre...0m6fremantle0/

The last lines of the log are here:
Code:
[2012-08-15 16:04:26] Copying source files to work dir
[2012-08-15 16:04:26] Extracting sources to work dir
[2012-08-15 16:04:26] cd /home/builder1/maemo-fremantle-i386-extras-devel/work && dpkg-source -x automake1.11_1.11.1-1+maemo11+0m6fremantle0.dsc 
[2012-08-15 16:04:26] 
dpkg-source: warning: extracting unsigned source package (automake1.11_1.11.1-1+maemo11+0m6fremantle0.dsc)
dpkg-source: info: extracting automake1.11 in automake1.11-1.11.1
dpkg-source: info: unpacking automake1.11_1.11.1.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: info: applying automake1.11_1.11.1-1+maemo11+0m6fremantle0.diff.gz
dpkg-source: info: upstream files that have been modified: 
 automake1.11-1.11.1/doc/automake.info
 automake1.11-1.11.1/doc/automake.info-1
 automake1.11-1.11.1/doc/automake.info-2
 automake1.11-1.11.1/doc/automake.texi
 automake1.11-1.11.1/doc/stamp-vti
 automake1.11-1.11.1/doc/version.texi
 automake1.11-1.11.1/lib/Automake/Makefile.in
 automake1.11-1.11.1/tests/ltorder.test
 automake1.11-1.11.1/tests/missing.test
 automake1.11-1.11.1/tests/missing2.test
[2012-08-15 16:04:26] cd /home/builder1/maemo-fremantle-i386-extras-devel/work/automake1.11-1.11.1 && dpkg-checkbuilddeps
[2012-08-15 16:04:27] Cleaning up...
[2012-08-15 16:04:27] Removing temporary target...
[2012-08-15 16:04:27] Done.
No error is reported, but the build is FAILED.
What's going on? Why does it silently fail?
__________________
If you want to support my work, you can donate by PayPal or Flattr

Projects no longer actively developed: here
Last edited by marmistrz; 2012-08-15 at 18:40.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to marmistrz For This Useful Post:
peterleinchen's Avatar
peterleinchen is offline peterleinchen
2012-08-15 , 22:08
Posts: 4,118 | Thanked: 8,901 times | Joined on Aug 2010 @ Ruhrgebiet, Germany
#2
For me it was a missing line ending in the conffiles file.
The autobuilder reported no error, but failed.

And one more possibly: mixed tab ordering in control file (every line in same section needs to start with a blank " ". Not sure, but iirc that was also one thing beinging the autobuilder failing silently.


So my suggestion is to check your debian files once more manually for any irregularity.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to peterleinchen For This Useful Post:
marmistrz is offline marmistrz
2012-08-16 , 13:55
Posts: 3,328 | Thanked: 4,476 times | Joined on May 2011 @ Poland
#3
Originally Posted by peterleinchen View Post
For me it was a missing line ending in the conffiles file.
The autobuilder reported no error, but failed.

And one more possibly: mixed tab ordering in control file (every line in same section needs to start with a blank " ". Not sure, but iirc that was also one thing beinging the autobuilder failing silently.


So my suggestion is to check your debian files once more manually for any irregularity.
I didn't notice anything that should be problematic. But I guess it's a problem with debian/control, as the last command is dpkg-checkbuilddeps.
Could you please take a look at the attached control, maybe you'll be able to notice what's wrong.
Thanks in advance
Attached Files
File Type: txt control.txt (1.4 KB, 82 views)
__________________
If you want to support my work, you can donate by PayPal or Flattr

Projects no longer actively developed: here
 
peterleinchen's Avatar
peterleinchen is offline peterleinchen
2012-08-16 , 20:26
Posts: 4,118 | Thanked: 8,901 times | Joined on Aug 2010 @ Ruhrgebiet, Germany
#4
Hey marmistrz

I am for sure neither a debian nor a packaging specialist. Just managed to get my own (one/first ) app build with autobuilder.
But maybe I found smth.

Section should (have to?) match the Maemo sections, put it in user/development.
Changed priority to extra (for maemo not used I believe).

What kind of source?
Python? Shell code? Leave architecture: all
C or any other programming lang? Change architecture: any (I did so, just an assumption)

Removed the last slash from homepage. Do not think that caused it, but anyway not needed. Also not sure about the position in control file (but imho should not disturb).
Not sure about that first apostroph her: `Makefile.am' (maybe omit it).

So try this attached version and see ...
Attached Files
File Type: txt control (1).txt (1.4 KB, 73 views)
 

The Following User Says Thank You to peterleinchen For This Useful Post:
marmistrz is offline marmistrz
2012-08-17 , 09:02
Posts: 3,328 | Thanked: 4,476 times | Joined on May 2011 @ Poland
#5
Originally Posted by peterleinchen View Post
Hey marmistrz

I am for sure neither a debian nor a packaging specialist. Just managed to get my own (one/first ) app build with autobuilder.
But maybe I found smth.

Section should (have to?) match the Maemo sections, put it in user/development.
Changed priority to extra (for maemo not used I believe).

What kind of source?
Python? Shell code? Leave architecture: all
C or any other programming lang? Change architecture: any (I did so, just an assumption)

Removed the last slash from homepage. Do not think that caused it, but anyway not needed. Also not sure about the position in control file (but imho should not disturb).
Not sure about that first apostroph her: `Makefile.am' (maybe omit it).

So try this attached version and see ...
That's what I'm sure of, apps don't have to match Maemo sections. If they don't match, they're just hidden.

I'll try it out, thanks!
__________________
If you want to support my work, you can donate by PayPal or Flattr

Projects no longer actively developed: here
 
marmistrz is offline marmistrz
2012-08-17 , 13:30
Posts: 3,328 | Thanked: 4,476 times | Joined on May 2011 @ Poland
#6
Originally Posted by peterleinchen View Post
Hey marmistrz

I am for sure neither a debian nor a packaging specialist. Just managed to get my own (one/first ) app build with autobuilder.
But maybe I found smth.

Section should (have to?) match the Maemo sections, put it in user/development.
Changed priority to extra (for maemo not used I believe).

What kind of source?
Python? Shell code? Leave architecture: all
C or any other programming lang? Change architecture: any (I did so, just an assumption)

Removed the last slash from homepage. Do not think that caused it, but anyway not needed. Also not sure about the position in control file (but imho should not disturb).
Not sure about that first apostroph her: `Makefile.am' (maybe omit it).

So try this attached version and see ...
Autobuilder accepts optional priority,
architecture is ok too.
Homepage and apostroph stuff removal doesn't fix anything...

Nevertheless, the autobuilder should report an error.
__________________
If you want to support my work, you can donate by PayPal or Flattr

Projects no longer actively developed: here
 
peterleinchen's Avatar
peterleinchen is offline peterleinchen
2012-08-17 , 21:12
Posts: 4,118 | Thanked: 8,901 times | Joined on Aug 2010 @ Ruhrgebiet, Germany
#7
Originally Posted by marmistrz View Post
Nevertheless, the autobuilder should report an error.
Yep, you are right.
Without proper error reporting, one has to check each byte/char of the control file.
Just guessing from now on:
Conflicts: occurs two times in the file.
And it conflicts with itself?
Code:
Conflicts: automake 
Depends: autoconf (>= 2.62) | autoconf2.67, autotools-dev (>= 20020320.1), ${misc:Depends}
Conflicts: automake1.6 (<< 1.6.1-4), automake (<< 1:1.4-p5-1), automake1.5 (<< 1.5-2), automake1.10-doc
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to peterleinchen For This Useful Post:
marmistrz is offline marmistrz
2012-08-18 , 09:40
Posts: 3,328 | Thanked: 4,476 times | Joined on May 2011 @ Poland
#8
Originally Posted by peterleinchen View Post
Yep, you are right.
Without proper error reporting, one has to check each byte/char of the control file.
Just guessing from now on:
Conflicts: occurs two times in the file.
And it conflicts with itself?
Code:
Conflicts: automake 
Depends: autoconf (>= 2.62) | autoconf2.67, autotools-dev (>= 20020320.1), ${misc:Depends}
Conflicts: automake1.6 (<< 1.6.1-4), automake (<< 1:1.4-p5-1), automake1.5 (<< 1.5-2), automake1.10-doc
It was that! I must've been blind! :P

thanks a lot!
__________________
If you want to support my work, you can donate by PayPal or Flattr

Projects no longer actively developed: here
 
peterleinchen's Avatar
peterleinchen is offline peterleinchen
2012-08-18 , 10:03
Posts: 4,118 | Thanked: 8,901 times | Joined on Aug 2010 @ Ruhrgebiet, Germany
#9
Great, that we managed

But I would expect from an autobuilder system at least a little hint, not only "FAILED"!
I had also hard times to find out .....

Anybody to contact about this?
 
marmistrz is offline marmistrz
2012-08-18 , 17:23
Posts: 3,328 | Thanked: 4,476 times | Joined on May 2011 @ Poland
#10
Originally Posted by peterleinchen View Post
Great, that we managed

But I would expect from an autobuilder system at least a little hint, not only "FAILED"!
I had also hard times to find out .....

Anybody to contact about this?
https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12658
__________________
If you want to support my work, you can donate by PayPal or Flattr

Projects no longer actively developed: here
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to marmistrz For This Useful Post:
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:31.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top