The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-03-31
, 17:06
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#472
|
Well they HAVE listened to us. But they should care about theyr bussiness in the first place. Not a few fanboys at TMO. Thats a fact.
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-03-31
, 17:29
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#473
|
I think you've missed another opposing "fact" to your so-called fact: How they treat the "fanboys" at TMO and how TMO "fanboys" react might be a barometer of things to come in the same way I'd made that point about Nokia ages ago. Nobody at Nokia wanted to listen back then either--I used to get a lot of "this isn't the place to get Nokia to pay attention" and I pointed out how it would serve them well to do so. You see how well that turned out?
Perhaps it would behoove them to start making more friends at TMO, seek out opinions and motivate participation from the developers who are among the many "fanboys" at TMO. I would think that it's exactly WHEN THEY ARE at this early point that they should especially value such opinions and community-building ahead of a release and during development.
...Or don't, and continue to ignore them. Let's see how well that turns out again. If nothing else, even if they succeed in finally putting this thing out, this adds more fuel to the notion that they're not interested in openness too.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mikecomputing For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-03-31
, 18:41
|
|
Posts: 2,448 |
Thanked: 9,523 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Wigan, UK
|
#474
|
![]() |
2013-03-31
, 18:57
|
Posts: 1,298 |
Thanked: 2,277 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#475
|
The Following User Says Thank You to shmerl For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-04-01
, 03:56
|
Moderator |
Posts: 5,320 |
Thanked: 4,464 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#476
|
If people could more of our non constructive time a TMO to start port apps and get involved in Merproject, it would be way more constuctive way to move forward!
To me it looks there is more active people in whining at TMO than there are active people in the merproject and thats make me wonder if there is a community future et all
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-04-01
, 08:51
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#477
|
It's incorrect & unfair to characterise what this initiative was intended to be as non-constructive & whining.
It's now not far from that through no fault of ours, but it could've been so much more...
The Following User Says Thank You to mikecomputing For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-04-01
, 12:53
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#478
|
I wouldn't even start comparing Nokia (today) and Jolla. Nokia became M$ vassal and patent troll. Jolla is working on innovate product and developing an open source [eventually] OS. Some rough communication is kind of a problem, but it's not the reason to compare them with Nokia.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-04-28
, 15:16
|
Moderator |
Posts: 5,320 |
Thanked: 4,464 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#479
|
![]() |
Tags |
jolla, nokia-again?, not-so-open, totally closed, zipper is open |
|
One which helps identify things they've neglected to think about much or at all, not just one that satisfies curiosities or eases concerns of devs/end-users.
This has all been discussed/explained, they did initially see the value in it & planned to engage, that died quickly though unfortunately.
Twitter/FB & the media drip-feed are far too ad-hoc for that sort of thing, we had a chance to do something with much more substance.
Anyway, all is not completely lost yet I guess, hopefully shmerl will get some more responsiveness from them soon, maybe I'll try again.
Last edited by jalyst; 2013-04-01 at 01:04. Reason: typo