The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to thedead1440 For This Useful Post: | ||
danramos, don_falcone, freemangordon, fw190, Jordi, kinggo, marbleuser, MartinK, OVK, qwazix, rcolistete, zwer |
|
2013-07-19
, 17:04
|
Posts: 1,298 |
Thanked: 2,277 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#712
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to shmerl For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-07-19
, 17:06
|
Moderator |
Posts: 6,215 |
Thanked: 6,400 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
|
#713
|
What the hell are you talking about? PySide can be ported to Qt5 just go out port it if you want it! its open source for got sake. Something that people can contribute on for free. But instead we sit here discussion instead of contribute
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to thedead1440 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-07-19
, 17:09
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#714
|
The whole issue that fmg has been alluding too is not about being good/bad adopters; its simply being led to believe initially that Qt4.8 and X11 was what would be in the first device but now with a beta SDK coming out, this has been changed abruptly.
Honestly, Jolla took their time to release the alpha SDK so they should have gone Qt5+Wayland at that time itself instead of doing so after releasing an alpha SDK. This type of abrupt changes after communicating something else is what fmg is probably alluding to about them not learning from their past history at Nokia.
I'm no dev so such changes don't matter to me but for others it may just be a case of why bother with a Company who doesn't know for sure what exactly it wants in its first device...
|
2013-07-19
, 17:17
|
Moderator |
Posts: 6,215 |
Thanked: 6,400 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
|
#716
|
<faenil> Stskeeps, have you already done the shift to Qt5? or is the first sdk image qt4?
[2013-01-26 01:02:18] <Stskeeps> first sailfish device would be qt4, it'd be suicide to turn the boat around at this time
[2013-01-26 01:02:37] <faenil> alright
[2013-01-26 01:02:37] <Stskeeps> qt5 comes later
[2013-01-26 01:03:01] <faenil> Stskeeps, is it becaues it's not mature?
[2013-01-26 01:03:08] <faenil> or because of time needed to port
[2013-01-26 01:03:15] <Stskeeps> it's more that it'd be too invasive to switch at the moment
[2013-01-26 01:03:21] <Stskeeps> and just because it's tempting it doesn't mean it's a good idea
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to thedead1440 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-07-19
, 17:19
|
|
Posts: 956 |
Thanked: 2,628 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
|
#717
|
I love this line of thinking; if a commercial company who plan to sell you a device for $$$ don't give you the basic tool-set to develop for their platform, go port it yourself for free.
@jake9xx 4m
Some update on the #Jolla #Sailfish #SDK , the final steps before QA are somewhat done -- it will be announced soon.. very soon
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Morpog For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-07-19
, 17:25
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#718
|
I love this line of thinking; if a commercial company who plan to sell you a device for $$$ don't give you the basic tool-set to develop for their platform, go port it yourself for free.
iOS/WP etc have their fanboys and Sailfish have you who tells people to port xyz to make Sailfish successful otherwise we won't have a linux-based phone OS and would have to live in this big bad world of Android & iOS domination...
|
2013-07-19
, 17:37
|
Posts: 1,298 |
Thanked: 2,277 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#719
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to shmerl For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-07-19
, 17:39
|
Posts: 154 |
Thanked: 110 times |
Joined on Aug 2011
|
#720
|
The Following User Says Thank You to marbleuser For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
jolla, nokia-again?, not-so-open, totally closed, zipper is open |
|
Honestly, Jolla took their time to release the alpha SDK so they should have gone Qt5+Wayland at that time itself instead of doing so after releasing an alpha SDK. This type of abrupt changes after communicating something else is what fmg is probably alluding to about them not learning from their past history at Nokia.
I'm no dev so such changes don't matter to me but for others it may just be a case of why bother with a Company who doesn't know for sure what exactly it wants in its first device...