Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
fpp's Avatar
Posts: 2,853 | Thanked: 968 times | Joined on Nov 2005
#71
That's illogical -- the 'i' suffix is when they add "internet capability" (generally a browser) to an existing phone. The "Internet Tablet", of course, already has what it takes to have the 'i'... but it's not a phone. So something like N800p or N810p could make sense... if they were to add a SIM slot to the tablets. But then they would have to add PIM functionality too, so we know it's out of the question :-)

I'm still rooting for an E-something.
 
Posts: 213 | Thanked: 97 times | Joined on Jan 2008
#72
I've got a feeling it probably starts with N9* (wild card).
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#73
Originally Posted by CyberCat View Post
I've got a feeling it probably starts with N9* (wild card).
Nah, there's no way it's a 900-series. N9?? would imply a big changeup in hardware (OMAP3, etc), which the model code suggests against. Besides, an N9?? release would piss off far too many new N810 owners.
 
Posts: 213 | Thanked: 97 times | Joined on Jan 2008
#74
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
Nah, there's no way it's a 900-series. N9?? would imply a big changeup in hardware (OMAP3, etc), which the model code suggests against. Besides, an N9?? release would piss off far too many new N810 owners.
I don't know. We already know it starts with N, we know it's not N820 or N830. I suppose it could be like N850 or N890 maybe. They could use the last digit too, like N895, N815, N835, etc. Is Nokia in the habit of using revision letters? Maybe we're talking something like *A or *a, *B, etc.

To be honest, I'm actually much more interested in finding out what other features are planned for the unit than its actual name.
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#75
I will say it is NOT an N9xx. GA's logic is spot-on there.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
johnkzin's Avatar
Posts: 1,878 | Thanked: 646 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ San Jose, CA
#76
Hm. Wonder about a minor version number increment. Like N811.
 
Posts: 213 | Thanked: 97 times | Joined on Jan 2008
#77
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
I will say it is NOT an N9xx. GA's logic is spot-on there.
Really. Interesting, well, I suppose my hunch was incorrect. In that case I'm going to say it'll be N8??. The second digit has to be 4-9, and the last will probably be 0, maybe 5 or 1. The vast majority of Nokia phones have 0 at the end.
 
Posts: 326 | Thanked: 39 times | Joined on Jul 2007
#78
I was thinking N880? Kind of like the N770?
 
Posts: 213 | Thanked: 97 times | Joined on Jan 2008
#79
Originally Posted by bartsimpson123844 View Post
I was thinking N880? Kind of like the N770?
Yeah, I'm thinking N880 or N890.
 
pipeline's Avatar
Posts: 693 | Thanked: 502 times | Joined on Jul 2007
#80
I think the rumored WiMax (WM) was incorrect... its actually that they realized their error of omission in the N8x0 series and they are planning a return to Magic Magnet™ technology!

So maybe N810+MM or both wimax -and- magic magnets! N810+MM+WM
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:48.