The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-11-24
, 21:59
|
Posts: 105 |
Thanked: 307 times |
Joined on Aug 2012
|
#232
|
|
2015-11-24
, 21:59
|
|
Posts: 1,296 |
Thanked: 1,773 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Budapest, Hungary
|
#233
|
sorry for my stupid consideration but why is so wanted from you? You have mini pc, you can have tablet, 2 in 1, why would i need a smartphone to use it as a pc? (with its little battery). you would need also a keyboard, a monitor, so what?
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Venemo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-11-24
, 23:06
|
Posts: 529 |
Thanked: 988 times |
Joined on Mar 2015
|
#234
|
|
2015-11-25
, 06:31
|
Posts: 347 |
Thanked: 441 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#235
|
I want it. I like the idea of working at my desktop, then disconnecting a pocketable mobile device from it and continuing my work as I go.
The concept of a mobile device that works differently than your desktop, that you "sync" to your desktop when you leave and return, was created (and perfected!) with the PDAs back in the 90's. All we've really got today with the smartphone world are PDAs that are also good media players...
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to The Wizard of Huz For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-11-25
, 06:35
|
Posts: 343 |
Thanked: 819 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Paris, France
|
#236
|
It would be weird to use my 13" laptop when I'm holding on onboard a tram.
Joke aside, it would be nice to have a device in the 6-7" form factor that I could use for on-the-go productivity. Currently nothing on the market can do it ― almost none of the devices have a hardware keyboard, none of them can run a development environment or a compiler, etc.
|
2015-11-25
, 06:47
|
Posts: 529 |
Thanked: 988 times |
Joined on Mar 2015
|
#237
|
|
2015-11-25
, 06:50
|
|
Posts: 1,296 |
Thanked: 1,773 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Budapest, Hungary
|
#238
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Venemo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-11-25
, 07:22
|
Posts: 187 |
Thanked: 121 times |
Joined on Jun 2011
@ Subang Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
|
#239
|
I would pay for that, as long as the code was also open. You are paying for someone to continue to work on the code, not for what has already been written.
Give people a subscriber ID and only take feature requests from people who are paying. That way you bypass the whole "fix it yourself" debate. Pay and get things fixed for you, or don't pay and make a code contribution, either is fine... just don't choose not to pay and still complain!
Jolla could target the Nexus line and let Google worry about hardware etc. The kind of people who buy Nexus devices are going to be the kind of people willing to try something different, too.
I don't know why, but once companies start down the road of listening to ad agencies, they seem to end up with loads of "features" that harm users but benefit the agencies. The whole idea of targeted ads is the opposite of the privacy respecting OS we all bought into. Hardly surprising therr's some "hostility" here!
Ha, one of the good guys from TMO wrote N9 like launcher in QML on top of Android
The Following User Says Thank You to Jeffrey04 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-11-25
, 07:30
|
|
Posts: 1,716 |
Thanked: 3,007 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#240
|
Joke aside, it would be nice to have a device in the 6-7" form factor that I could use for on-the-go productivity. Currently nothing on the market can do it
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to smoku For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
brainfiction, brainstorming, fiction, jolla or iphone, neigh!, unicorn device |
|
What for? I always considered a swipe interface a crutch to compensate for an inadequate set of I/O. I mean, it's OK if all you have is a touch screen but why would you bother if you have something better?
Русский военный корабль, иди нахуй!