![]() |
2015-12-17
, 07:36
|
Posts: 592 |
Thanked: 1,167 times |
Joined on Jul 2012
|
#242
|
Some people try to do the same thing again and again and expect different result
The Following User Says Thank You to tortoisedoc For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-12-17
, 10:03
|
|
Posts: 1,389 |
Thanked: 1,857 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Israel
|
#243
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ZogG For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-12-17
, 11:14
|
|
Posts: 6,453 |
Thanked: 20,983 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#244
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-12-17
, 11:24
|
Posts: 307 |
Thanked: 1,460 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ Switzerland
|
#245
|
![]() |
2015-12-17
, 13:46
|
Posts: 285 |
Thanked: 1,900 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#246
|
![]() |
2015-12-17
, 14:44
|
|
Posts: 1,389 |
Thanked: 1,857 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Israel
|
#247
|
Without product, none of the other parts have no relevance. Also, latter reside on sufficient amount of resources. Which leads to conclusion: for big money and big corporations only. Startups, don't bother.
![]() |
2015-12-17
, 15:30
|
Posts: 285 |
Thanked: 1,900 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#248
|
And don't start "but it's linux", I can have n900 and it's more linux. Btw you can have a lot of linux stuff on android and even on jailbroken iOS(unix after all).
It's about platform. And platform is not golden shinny brick, but something that is working, have support and applications/features developed by 3rd parties, which is more important for "startup" company.
As about "startup" - they are here for a really long time already, but yes, on every failure we call them startup. It's there problem and it's not an excuse. there are plenty smaller companies that succeeded more with lower investments at the beginning (they had from Nokia some $ as help for ex-nokians, not even talking about meego related parts they got access too and experience).
They are company with small amount of people, but not a startup.
On their own words they had mature product for a while ago. but they failed to get developers and 3rd parties interested in them, by trying over controlling and doing everything by themselves behind walls (not even share info they had to. e.g. is current situation and no update for a really long time).
no one forced them to conquer the word, they could go smaller first and use money wisely. i'll remind you that all huge corporations started as small companies, but those days there was no such definition as "startup", so they had no excuse.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JulmaHerra For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-12-17
, 15:38
|
Posts: 702 |
Thanked: 2,059 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ UK
|
#249
|
Show me one such startup that has done something of same magnitude as Jolla has using less resources and being profitable since from the beginning.
![]() |
2015-12-17
, 16:02
|
Posts: 285 |
Thanked: 1,900 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#250
|
You don't have to look far.
There was once this guy called Linus, from Finland.
I think what ZogG is getting at is Jolla needed to get a lot of people on board and they squandered it by having too many barriers in the way. eg. limited docs, api, no paid apps, limited developer outreach...
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to JulmaHerra For This Useful Post: | ||
IRC nick on freenode — ZogG
imgrup