Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
ZogG's Avatar
Posts: 1,389 | Thanked: 1,857 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Israel
#241
Originally Posted by tortoisedoc View Post
Past does not count in startup world - only meaningful time is NOW, and FUTURE!
Some people try to do the same thing again and again and expect different result
__________________
IRC nick on freenode — ZogG
imgrup
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ZogG For This Useful Post:
Posts: 592 | Thanked: 1,167 times | Joined on Jul 2012
#242
Originally Posted by ZogG View Post
Some people try to do the same thing again and again and expect different result
But "doing the same thing" is not the same as "making the same product", as you can make the same product in many ways
__________________
BWizz - best N9 bookmark editing tool! Check it out ->BWizz for Harmattan

LINKer - transform your N9's home view in a Desktop, give it the freedom it deserves! -> LINKer for Harmattan

QuickBar - Can't find the app you used yesterday in your overcrowded Home Screen? Want access to the QuickLaunch bar even in the home screen? QuickBar for Harmattan

If you like our work, and would like to support via PayPal : users.giulietta@gmail.com
 

The Following User Says Thank You to tortoisedoc For This Useful Post:
ZogG's Avatar
Posts: 1,389 | Thanked: 1,857 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Israel
#243
Originally Posted by tortoisedoc View Post
But "doing the same thing" is not the same as "making the same product", as you can make the same product in many ways
Doing same mistakes. i think you share the same mistake as Jolla does. Product is important part, but it's not about product. It's about platform and moreover - support, communication, interaction, inovation, cooperation with 3rd parties and indie devs.
__________________
IRC nick on freenode — ZogG
imgrup
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ZogG For This Useful Post:
pichlo's Avatar
Posts: 6,453 | Thanked: 20,983 times | Joined on Sep 2012 @ UK
#244
Originally Posted by ZogG View Post
Doing same mistakes.
All those Jolla revellers, every time you are about to post again how fantastic and absolutely faultless Jolla is in every aspect, please remind yourself this one crucial thing:

They learned how to run business at Nokia!

That single thing explains everything. It is the corner stone of understanding Jolla's behaviour. Yet it seems like some people's memory is comparable to a koi carp's.
__________________
Русский военный корабль, иди нахуй!
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post:
Posts: 307 | Thanked: 1,460 times | Joined on May 2011 @ Switzerland
#245
Originally Posted by pichlo View Post
They learned how to run business at Nokia!
Nokia's biggest failure was to listen to american shareholders. Jolla seems to have learned from that, by not having any.
 

The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to billranton For This Useful Post:
Posts: 285 | Thanked: 1,900 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#246
Originally Posted by ZogG View Post
Product is important part, but it's not about product. It's about platform and moreover - support, communication, interaction, inovation, cooperation with 3rd parties and indie devs.
Without product, none of the other parts have no relevance. Also, latter reside on sufficient amount of resources. Which leads to conclusion: for big money and big corporations only. Startups, don't bother.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to JulmaHerra For This Useful Post:
ZogG's Avatar
Posts: 1,389 | Thanked: 1,857 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Israel
#247
Originally Posted by JulmaHerra View Post
Without product, none of the other parts have no relevance. Also, latter reside on sufficient amount of resources. Which leads to conclusion: for big money and big corporations only. Startups, don't bother.
Again, i did not told you that product is not important. but smartphone is not phone. It should do more than just call. And don't start "but it's linux", I can have n900 and it's more linux. Btw you can have a lot of linux stuff on android and even on jailbroken iOS(unix after all).
It's about platform. And platform is not golden shinny brick, but something that is working, have support and applications/features developed by 3rd parties, which is more important for "startup" company.
As about "startup" - they are here for a really long time already, but yes, on every failure we call them startup. It's there problem and it's not an excuse. there are plenty smaller companies that succeeded more with lower investments at the beginning (they had from Nokia some $ as help for ex-nokians, not even talking about meego related parts they got access too and experience).
They are company with small amount of people, but not a startup. On their own words they had mature product for a while ago. but they failed to get developers and 3rd parties interested in them, by trying over controlling and doing everything by themselves behind walls (not even share info they had to. e.g. is current situation and no update for a really long time).
no one forced them to conquer the word, they could go smaller first and use money wisely. i'll remind you that all huge corporations started as small companies, but those days there was no such definition as "startup", so they had no excuse.
__________________
IRC nick on freenode — ZogG
imgrup
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ZogG For This Useful Post:
Posts: 285 | Thanked: 1,900 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#248
Originally Posted by ZogG View Post
It should do more than just call.
True.

And don't start "but it's linux", I can have n900 and it's more linux. Btw you can have a lot of linux stuff on android and even on jailbroken iOS(unix after all).
I won't as for me it being Linux is mostly a "means to an end"-kind of thing.

It's about platform. And platform is not golden shinny brick, but something that is working, have support and applications/features developed by 3rd parties, which is more important for "startup" company.
True, however, doing it "the right way" (whatever that means as mostly people can only describe that it is not...) requires resources, money, good will and luck. Which leads to the same old thing: without backing of big money, chances are you will fail.

As about "startup" - they are here for a really long time already, but yes, on every failure we call them startup. It's there problem and it's not an excuse. there are plenty smaller companies that succeeded more with lower investments at the beginning (they had from Nokia some $ as help for ex-nokians, not even talking about meego related parts they got access too and experience).
Show me one such startup that has done something of same magnitude as Jolla has using less resources and being profitable since from the beginning. Shouldn't be a problem as I get the impression there is one on every street corner...

They are company with small amount of people, but not a startup.
Fundamentally it all boils down to one single problem that is common for startups: money. No matter how you twist and turn it, it has been the number one problem since from the beginning. So we can call them startups or non-startups or whatever you wish, as it's mostly irrelevant to the root cause of the problems which is money and resources.

On their own words they had mature product for a while ago. but they failed to get developers and 3rd parties interested in them, by trying over controlling and doing everything by themselves behind walls (not even share info they had to. e.g. is current situation and no update for a really long time).
no one forced them to conquer the word, they could go smaller first and use money wisely. i'll remind you that all huge corporations started as small companies, but those days there was no such definition as "startup", so they had no excuse.
Possibly. It was the cost of not fragmenting the platform, which was major PITA in Android years ago until Google decided to take it more strictly under their control. If they didn't try to control it as tightly, they might have attracted couple of other companies, which is why they are likely to change that in the future. It may or may not attract other companies to do some of the lifting, now that the basics are mostly in place. Remains to be seen.

Also, I really don't see how you make mobile OS by going smaller. There are functions that must be in place and the foundation has to be solid and there are no shortcuts for achieving them. Also, you will need to have something to show (like products someone is actually using). So, if it was going "smaller", it would most likely be something very different than independent mobile OS. Of course there would be nothing wrong with it per se, we just would be discussing about something very different thing than we currently are.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JulmaHerra For This Useful Post:
Posts: 702 | Thanked: 2,059 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ UK
#249
Originally Posted by JulmaHerra View Post
Show me one such startup that has done something of same magnitude as Jolla has using less resources and being profitable since from the beginning.
You don't have to look far.

There was once this guy called Linus, from Finland.

Or some British guy working in Switzerland.

I think what ZogG is getting at is Jolla needed to get a lot of people on board and they squandered it by having too many barriers in the way. eg. limited docs, api, no paid apps, limited developer outreach...
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to aegis For This Useful Post:
Posts: 285 | Thanked: 1,900 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#250
Originally Posted by aegis View Post
You don't have to look far.

There was once this guy called Linus, from Finland.
...and it what time frame was all of it succeeding, in what king of environment/market? How many mobile phones or comparable products Linus launched? Time is not an infinite resource when creating complex commercial product.

I think what ZogG is getting at is Jolla needed to get a lot of people on board and they squandered it by having too many barriers in the way. eg. limited docs, api, no paid apps, limited developer outreach...
Yes. However, some of the api-restrictions were there because of unstable Qt-version they had to use, which IMO was good reason to restrict them. Don't know about current restrictions though. Also, having all of those other things doesn't come free either and having too much of "administrative burden" may have undesirable results. That's why there has to be something in place to begin with and when it's opened, all of the documentation, api's, bug trackers, infrastructure to support public contributions etc etc have to be in place in such way they don't need to be parsed by developers in difficult and painful way (which is the main reason there's so little interest in contributing to ie. Nemo-project). Doing all of those takes resources, which has to be derived from resources and time used in developing the platform itself, which means there are choices to be made how they are prioritized. Usually they are always prioritized "wrong" as there is always the army of people who know better how to do things even without having insider knowledge from company.

Another thing is that there will always be that one major gripe that was there in the Nokia days also - some things have to be kept out of the public for certain periods of time (ie. regarding new products and their features), which has to be solved somehow without making it all a huge mess. So, I don't really believe there are easy solutions for these things until the resources problem (sustainability of the company) is solved somehow. We may hear something tomorrow, let's hope it's good.
 

The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to JulmaHerra For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:52.