The Following User Says Thank You to aegis For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2016-06-24
, 16:23
|
Posts: 3,328 |
Thanked: 4,476 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ Poland
|
#22
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to marmistrz For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2016-06-24
, 16:49
|
|
Posts: 6,453 |
Thanked: 20,983 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#23
|
You'd be nucking futs to have your app state storage "in the cloud".
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2016-06-24
, 17:25
|
Posts: 1,873 |
Thanked: 4,529 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ North Potomac MD
|
#24
|
Not the OS, the apps themselves do. A lot of them. On Android.
Exactly!
But now I see your point. You were talking about the OS implementation, not the user experience. From the user experience, it matters monkey's kidneys what an idle application does. Whether it stays idle in the RAM for as long as possible or is swapped out right away. As long as it does not impair the experience.
We have had a discussion on multitasking before. Even multitasking on Android specifically. It is all too well "ps -aux" showing you a bunch of stuff. By that reckoning, you can say that DOS was a multitasking OS too: it could play a tune while you moved the mouse cursor around the screen. But for me as a user, it is not a real multitasking if a video I am playing stops when I switch to the browser.
Multi = more than one. Task = task. Multitasking = doing more than one task simultaneously. I don't care that the OS can run many processes. If the OS stops me from doing more than one task, then as far as I am concerned, it does not support multitasking. Simples.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to mscion For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2016-06-24
, 18:32
|
Posts: 649 |
Thanked: 762 times |
Joined on Mar 2012
@ Ohio
|
#25
|
But for me as a user, it is not a real multitasking if a video I am playing stops when I switch to the browser.
Multi = more than one. Task = task. Multitasking = doing more than one task simultaneously. I don't care that the OS can run many processes. If the OS stops me from doing more than one task, then as far as I am concerned, it does not support multitasking. Simples.
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to imaginaryenemy For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2016-06-25
, 14:18
|
Posts: 69 |
Thanked: 195 times |
Joined on Jan 2013
@ kerala
|
#26
|
This is all doable on stock android (let alone OEM skins like Samsung's Touchwiz and their split screen multitasking). I play videos (including ones from YouTube) through VLC in the background while I'm doing any number of tasks.
Again, it depends on what the user is looking for. My multitasking experience is no more hindered on Android than it was on Harmattan.
![]() |
2016-06-25
, 22:31
|
Posts: 649 |
Thanked: 762 times |
Joined on Mar 2012
@ Ohio
|
#27
|
Thats nice. If you can play video in the background and edit a word file, that is good enough multitasking for me. But may i know which phone you have. I am pretty sure samsungs (the ones without the ability for splitscreen) cannot do that.
Let me tell you a typical mutltiasking scenario where i have seen most android fail. You try an load a website. Here in india we are still with 2g/3g. So an average website in desktop mode takes around 5 seconds to load. With E71,E72,E7,n900,n9 or BB10 i always try to open some other app in the mean time. (May be check messages in whatsapp or read the rest of the pdf which i had open) and then come back to the browser to see if the web page has loaded. All the android phones i have used till now reloads or wouldnt have finished downloading when i come back after say about 20 secs. That said my android exposure is limited to my cousin's moto x(2 GB ram), my sisters moto g (2 GB) and my parents samsungs with 1-2gb ram. Can the present androids do that?
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to imaginaryenemy For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2016-06-26
, 12:22
|
Posts: 69 |
Thanked: 195 times |
Joined on Jan 2013
@ kerala
|
#28
|
The Following User Says Thank You to padmaraj.ravi For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2016-06-26
, 20:08
|
Posts: 649 |
Thanked: 762 times |
Joined on Mar 2012
@ Ohio
|
#29
|
Yes it works. I tested with android 6.0 in my sis's moto G as well. So then android multitasking behavior has had subtle changes over the iterations. One thing i noticed was that firefox does this always (downloading pages in background) while the stock browser was unreliable at times. With heavy websites , sometimes it loads in the background , and at other time it reloads. Have you noticed this? One another question is if such background tasks happen in android , what is so different in case of stock browser pausing youtube? Makes me wonder is there differential treatment of apps with respect to multitasking? Phone and other os apps definitely will have differential treatment, but other than that?
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to imaginaryenemy For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2016-06-26
, 21:16
|
Community Council |
Posts: 691 |
Thanked: 1,240 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Mbabane
|
#30
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to sicelo For This Useful Post: | ||
What we're talking about here is the way Android works, which is that it keeps an instance of the running app in RAM on the device. It keeps it there as much as it can before saving it to local storage if it has to. You'd be nucking futs to have your app state storage "in the cloud".