|
2016-07-12
, 15:29
|
Posts: 78 |
Thanked: 200 times |
Joined on Nov 2013
|
#42
|
|
2016-07-12
, 15:41
|
Community Council |
Posts: 4,920 |
Thanked: 12,867 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ Southerrn Finland
|
#43
|
|
2016-07-12
, 16:03
|
Posts: 78 |
Thanked: 200 times |
Joined on Nov 2013
|
#44
|
|
2016-07-12
, 16:07
|
|
Posts: 6,450 |
Thanked: 20,982 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#45
|
|
2016-07-12
, 16:17
|
Posts: 78 |
Thanked: 200 times |
Joined on Nov 2013
|
#46
|
|
2016-07-12
, 16:22
|
|
Posts: 405 |
Thanked: 961 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ London, UK
|
#47
|
|
2016-07-12
, 16:33
|
Posts: 959 |
Thanked: 3,427 times |
Joined on Apr 2012
|
#48
|
I would not put it as succinctly as juiceme, but I definitely consider Android support a double-edged sword and the decision to include it short-sighted. Yes, it may have attracted a few more users in the short term, but has caused an unspeakable damage in the long term. One obvious reason is that there is very little incentive to develop native applications. But there is another, even more serious reason. Keep in mind that if your sales tactic is, "it is not really a goose, look, it can quack like a duck", then you may attract a lot of buyers who do not really want a goose but a duck. This very thread is proof that those users will sooner or later become disillusioned when they realize that they have purchased a goose dressed as a duck.
|
2016-07-12
, 17:04
|
|
Posts: 6,450 |
Thanked: 20,982 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#49
|
Jolla does have the consistent styling of native apps as a big plus however; it is instantly clear whether an app is a native Sailfish app or an Android app, and that does provide some incentive to provide Sailfish versions of apps.
|
2016-07-12
, 22:34
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#50
|
No, because the support for Android applications has been one of the big selling points of Sailfish OS since the very beginning.
I only regret I cannot give more than one thanks to your post!