![]() |
2008-03-13
, 15:13
|
Posts: 70 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#12
|
![]() |
2008-03-13
, 21:35
|
|
Posts: 466 |
Thanked: 142 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Temple Terrorist, FL
|
#13
|
![]() |
2008-04-02
, 04:30
|
Posts: 4 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#14
|
![]() |
2017-10-06
, 17:25
|
Posts: 513 |
Thanked: 635 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
|
#15
|
![]() |
2017-10-07
, 18:39
|
|
Posts: 466 |
Thanked: 142 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Temple Terrorist, FL
|
#16
|
The Following User Says Thank You to OSEmuTech For This Useful Post: | ||
Basilisk's NT port hasn't supported the Classic series since build 94, and the only download I've found for that build is a corrupted .zip file! I own a Classic and a Plus, both un-ROM-rippable 300 miles away in a parent's garage, so I'm limited to what I can find downloading. so far all i've found is a IIcx ROM that passes checksum (according to the NT port, which will identify it but won't run it). Setting up a different prefs file manually for modelID and CPU, I keep getting the Basilisk error "can't read ROM file." Is this something wrong with my specific ROM file, or can Basilisk 0.9 not run classic 256K ROMs? I don't have a Linux or OS X desktop to check this against...
thx,
__throw