|
2008-11-27
, 11:23
|
|
Posts: 415 |
Thanked: 182 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Leeds UK
|
#2
|
|
2008-11-27
, 11:33
|
|
Posts: 3,404 |
Thanked: 4,474 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ Germany
|
#3
|
|
2008-11-27
, 12:21
|
Posts: 179 |
Thanked: 1,679 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
@ Helsinki
|
#4
|
The Following 36 Users Say Thank You to Peter@Maemo Marketing For This Useful Post: | ||
aot, b-man, bafio, branchingfactor, Bundyo, dafrabbit, davadio, deadmalc, deeteroderdas, doctorbri, fatdat888, free, Glasswalker, hordeman, Jaffa, jzencovich, lcuk, mobiledivide, Munk, Naranek, Nelson L. Squeeko, Oberon85, pk11, pycage, qole, qwerty12, Rebski, Red, rittf800, rok, sjgadsby, Stskeeps, TA-t3, Texrat, yerga, yukky |
|
2008-11-27
, 13:51
|
Posts: 345 |
Thanked: 467 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Germany
|
#5
|
|
2008-11-27
, 14:30
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#7
|
Because we are developing Maemo 5 with an UI and application framework that uses Clutter-based hardware graphics acceleration, it is not trivial to make the same code run on devices that do not have hardware-based graphics acceleration.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tso For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-11-27
, 16:11
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#9
|
|
2008-11-27
, 16:17
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#10
|
Honestly, that's probably the less interesting direction. The interesting direction is re-tooling the already more-open Fremantle for OMAP2 hardware.
What I know so far about Maemo5 is (if I understand it correctly) that there'll be early alphas starting Dec. 2008, but there's no Nokia-device that would be able to run these releases. I also was under the impression that these early releases might work on non-Nokia hardware like Beagle Board or maybe even Pandora.
Recently, when I talked about this to a friend of mine who lives entirely in his Apple-universe, he told me this was absolutely unthinkable and I had to be mistaken: There was no way, he said, a company like Nokia could release an OS, even as an early alpha, when there was no Nokia hardware, but only hardware from other vendors it would run on.
This was the first time I thought about this:
It really seems a little strange. On the other hand, it's a logical thing to do when you want developers to release 3rd party applications in time.
So how did Nokia handle this when they released new versions of their phone platforms? IIRC, there was a compatibility break between some revisions of S60. What did developers have then? Did they have any Nokia-hardware the new system would run on before the official release? Did they have a SDK that emulated the whole device on a x86-PC? Or did Nokia release hardware and the new software at the same time? (I guess the last option, Nokia releasing the software and directing developers to non-Nokia phones to work with it, is out of the question here.)
Does anybody know?
It would be interesting if the way Nokia deals with software in general changed with the Maemo process.