![]() |
2009-01-09
, 00:01
|
Posts: 80 |
Thanked: 111 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
@ Moscow, Russia
|
#212
|
The Following User Says Thank You to pronvit For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-01-09
, 09:43
|
Posts: 566 |
Thanked: 150 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#213
|
The Following User Says Thank You to iamthewalrus For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-01-09
, 10:35
|
Posts: 13 |
Thanked: 20 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Switzerland
|
#215
|
![]() |
2009-01-09
, 11:00
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#216
|
![]() |
2009-01-09
, 11:34
|
Posts: 161 |
Thanked: 99 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#217
|
The Following User Says Thank You to iskarion For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-01-09
, 12:17
|
Posts: 52 |
Thanked: 25 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Stockholm, Sweden
|
#218
|
![]() |
2009-01-09
, 12:46
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#219
|
![]() |
2009-01-09
, 13:23
|
Posts: 66 |
Thanked: 21 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#220
|
That said, in gconf the available settings appear to be
Also, before I started monkeying with gconf, using kinetic scrolling was beautiful and perfect, but now it seems to not cache offscreen areas of the page (i.e. until scroll stops moving, all that appears in the newly exposed region is a finely tiled image of whatever used to be on the bottom of the screen). This behavior continues even after resetting all gconf keys. Any idea why this happens or how to fix it?
Thanks again pronvit for all your hard work -- this is by far one of the best enhancements I've come across for the NITs
EDIT: Hmm, this didn't work the first time, but a reboot after --recursive-unset appears to have fixed the problem, and now I am able to set scrollbars=0 and kscrollfading to 0.95, which are IMO ideal. This is awesome.
Last edited by semiquaver; 2009-01-08 at 23:43.