![]() |
2009-05-21
, 01:35
|
|
Posts: 294 |
Thanked: 174 times |
Joined on Apr 2007
|
#42
|
![]() |
2009-05-22
, 05:06
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,541 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#43
|
Isn't there ethical issues about location based advertisement (I am not talking about legal). Something that tracks your location and suggest things based on your purchase history or demographics.
Just because we can clone a hamster/dog hybrd doesn't mean we should.
Nokia seems to be proud of its social contributions, "greener planet" stuff, then why start down this dark path.
I can only imagine what AT&T wireless would do with this. Atleast if I get a commercial on my cable tv programming I can fast forward through it or switch channels, its not constantly taking up my screen space and reminding me its time to buy more beer.
![]() |
2009-05-22
, 10:05
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#44
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to benny1967 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-05-22
, 10:50
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#45
|
what does this mean for the future of alternatives like debian and mer on maemo devices?
wouldn't it mean that they'd need to block any possibility to boot into an alternate OS or else consumers would simply avoid having the ad by using mer instead of maemo?
this would be more annoying than the ad itself, because it might lead to a design decision that affects both the subsidized and the non-subsidized variants.
![]() |
2009-05-22
, 11:02
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#46
|
...what's much more interesting, though:
imagine there really is a subsidized version that has a place for ads hardwired to the homescreen. what does this mean for the future of alternatives like debian and mer on maemo devices?
wouldn't it mean that they'd need to block any possibility to boot into an alternate OS or else consumers would simply avoid having the ad by using mer instead of maemo?
this would be more annoying than the ad itself, because it might lead to a design decision that affects both the subsidized and the non-subsidized variants.
Is this what we are all doing here?
![]() |
2009-05-22
, 11:25
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#47
|
i think it's a reasonable thing to do in this market: build upon a strong, free software platform, but put something on top that sets you apart from the others that use the same platform as a base.
![]() |
2009-05-22
, 12:05
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#48
|
they never claimed the UI would be community developed, did they?
imagine there really is a subsidized version that has a place for ads hardwired to the homescreen.
wouldn't it mean that they'd need to block any possibility to boot into an alternate OS or else consumers would simply avoid having the ad by using mer instead of maemo?
this would be more annoying than the ad itself, because it might lead to a design decision that affects both the subsidized and the non-subsidized variants.
![]() |
2009-05-22
, 12:09
|
|
Posts: 1,635 |
Thanked: 1,816 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
@ Manchester, England
|
#49
|
The Following User Says Thank You to lcuk For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-05-22
, 12:21
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#50
|
I'm not following though how that necessitates a design decision that affects the non-subsidized version.
Shhhh...
I'm thinkin' the Nokia brand will be to hard to resist now that they have built a loyal community around Maemo... so I pick door #1.
Time to grab that hackmyharmattan.com domain while it is still available.