|
2009-06-01
, 03:52
|
Posts: 51 |
Thanked: 22 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Seattle
|
#32
|
|
2009-06-01
, 04:44
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#33
|
Really, though, there'd be little advantage to underclocking (and potentially a bit of disadvantage) with race-to-idle and all that.
|
2009-06-01
, 09:24
|
|
Posts: 2,853 |
Thanked: 968 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
|
#34
|
|
2009-06-01
, 09:45
|
Posts: 119 |
Thanked: 412 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
|
#35
|
|
2009-06-01
, 09:51
|
Posts: 119 |
Thanked: 412 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
|
#36
|
The Following User Says Thank You to lbt For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-06-01
, 09:53
|
Posts: 119 |
Thanked: 412 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
|
#37
|
The Following User Says Thank You to lbt For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-06-01
, 11:14
|
Posts: 119 |
Thanked: 412 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
|
#38
|
Here's a question that is sigting on my mind a bit: did any of the devices have a form factor that do not look like currently announed or selling Nokia mobile devices? This is just a yes or no question; I'm quite aware that more that that is too much.
Another question (if you want to get playful): you speak of not even noticng the screen size, which is obviously a shot towards recent comments. Can you go into some of the unique things that you noticed such as the polish of the UI or even if the software felt better tied to the hardware as you sed those devices?
I've got an inkling on things. A small one. But I've got thoughts and Nokia just might have tipped their hand some.
|
2009-06-01
, 11:44
|
|
Posts: 794 |
Thanked: 784 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ /Canada/Ontario/GTA
|
#39
|
|
2009-06-01
, 12:04
|
|
Posts: 3,105 |
Thanked: 11,088 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Mountain View (CA, USA)
|
#40
|
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to qgil For This Useful Post: | ||
The picture is mine and I wasthe one asking people not to take pictures. The only reason for that was to avoid those pictures flying through the blogosphere out of context and being finally sentenced as the NEXT MAEMO DEVICE LEAKED BLA BLU BLI. The evnt had free entrance and the room where the units could be used had an open door as well. All what developers had to do to use the units was to put the name on a piece of paper (white paper just for the record, not any NDA).
This is quite unprecedented but we thought the Maemo and Mozilla communities are trustable and worth experimenting with. About why not using them more widely, one of the reasons is that they are quite expensive to produce and they are primarily targeted to the developers paid full time to have the software ready, better yesterday than next week. I'm happy we could borrow them for the weekend.
http://maemo.org/profile/view/qgil/ + http://qt-project.org