![]() |
2009-07-09
, 06:23
|
Posts: 1,213 |
Thanked: 356 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ California and Virginia
|
#2
|
and knowing that I peronally think touchscreens are unacceptable in phones..
![]() |
2009-07-09
, 06:27
|
|
Posts: 3,404 |
Thanked: 4,474 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ Germany
|
#3
|
![]() |
2009-07-09
, 08:18
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#4
|
![]() |
2009-07-09
, 09:15
|
Posts: 631 |
Thanked: 1,123 times |
Joined on Sep 2005
@ Helsinki
|
#5
|
![]() |
2009-07-09
, 10:14
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#6
|
![]() |
2009-07-09
, 10:49
|
|
Posts: 3,404 |
Thanked: 4,474 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ Germany
|
#7
|
One thumb use
(Go and watch people who use touchscreen phones, no matter which brand: They'll always hold it in one hand and tap on it with the other hand.)
Tactile feedback
I need to be able to operate the device without looking at it. It's a mobile device, so I do things with it while I walk, while I talk to somebody, etc.
With hardware buttons, I'm always certain what to do: One to the left, one down, press. Center, press. Quick look at the display, one up, press. You cannot do this with a touch screen.
The Following User Says Thank You to pycage For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-07-09
, 12:55
|
|
Posts: 861 |
Thanked: 734 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Nomadic
|
#8
|
Those people must be kids with short fingers. I can and do use my touch screen phone with one hand easily. The thumb can comfortably reach every corner on the screen. In the end it depends on the phone. This puts a limitation on the screen size of the phone, of course. The N900's screen will be too large then....
![]() |
2009-07-09
, 13:06
|
|
Posts: 240 |
Thanked: 71 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
|
#9
|
![]() |
2009-07-09
, 13:13
|
|
Posts: 861 |
Thanked: 734 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Nomadic
|
#10
|
Saying you need a phone without a touch screen and with regular buttons, I'm surprised you're not a believer of the 'a phone is a phone' way of thinking. Having Maemo on a small, non-touch QVGA display would destroy everything that makes it what it is. Apps will have to be radically redesigned, in such a way that they may as well be on a different OS with a bigger existing user base AND optimised solely for the mobile purpose. It's like having XP or Ubuntu on your phone, both fantastic and loved systems, but completely impractical for small mobile purposes, as their main methods of both display and interface are gone completely. I think if Maemo becomes the new touchscreen Nokia standard, S60 should die a death and S40 should become the regular Nokia standard.
The Following User Says Thank You to ARJWright For This Useful Post: | ||
Or, wait a minute - how about a non-touchscreen device based on something they'd call "almost Maemo"? How easy/difficult would it be to re-use the software underneath the UI for a conventional phone and what exactly is it that would have to be changed?
Help me think about it:
If such a device had a dpad as a pointing device and some extra buttons like current S60 devices have, what would they need to change in order to get Maemo running?
Isn't it just a matter of adapting the HIG for even smaller screens? And maybe replacing Hildon (adapting Qt) by a layer that, say, maps buttons to hardware keys and makes sure applications cannot offer 15 buttons when only 2 hardware keys are available?
Sure such a system would most likely exist in addition to Maemo, not running Maemo software that's designed for touchscreens. But still, it would share a lot of the underlying technical concepts.
What am I missing?
Would it be possible without touching Maemo's non-UI components?