The Following User Says Thank You to thoughtfix For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2007-01-21
, 12:02
|
|
Posts: 3,220 |
Thanked: 326 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)
|
#2
|
Again, I direct us all to Orb.
Here's the article.
160k/s is perfectly fine for YouTube quality videos, and chances are you can get that wherever you find your bandwidth.
![]() |
2007-01-21
, 13:43
|
|
Posts: 564 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ Fayetteville, GA
|
#3
|
![]() |
2007-01-21
, 13:54
|
Posts: 15 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Sep 2006
|
#4
|
![]() |
2007-01-21
, 19:26
|
|
Posts: 832 |
Thanked: 75 times |
Joined on Dec 2005
@ Phoenix, AZ
|
#5
|
Here's the article.
160k/s is perfectly fine for YouTube quality videos, and chances are you can get that wherever you find your bandwidth.
--Daniel G
TabletBlog.com - Thoughtfix's Nokia Internet Tablet Blog