![]() |
2009-08-26
, 23:08
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#312
|
|
2009-08-27
, 01:06
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#313
|
![]() |
2009-08-27
, 06:19
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#314
|
![]() |
2009-08-27
, 06:31
|
|
Posts: 1,028 |
Thanked: 578 times |
Joined on Mar 2009
@ Chicago
|
#315
|
![]() |
2009-08-27
, 11:01
|
Posts: 397 |
Thanked: 227 times |
Joined on May 2007
|
#316
|
![]() |
2009-08-27
, 11:22
|
|
Posts: 1,878 |
Thanked: 646 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ San Jose, CA
|
#317
|
![]() |
2009-08-27
, 11:39
|
|
Posts: 1,878 |
Thanked: 646 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ San Jose, CA
|
#318
|
Obviously smaller devices would gain bigger benefits from such instant Beowulf clustering!
![]() |
2009-08-27
, 12:12
|
|
Posts: 2,853 |
Thanked: 968 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
|
#319
|
![]() |
2009-08-27
, 15:22
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#320
|
I'll let you know if I ever find a task for which the right tool was Windows.
However it'd be nice if I could "tether" my handheld (phone or other devices) easily and automagically to share its cycles (and storage of course) with the active device. And vice versa. Obviously smaller devices would gain bigger benefits from such instant Beowulf clustering!
Who's gonna patent that? Here would be something for the OSS gurus to figure out, using e.g. UWB and some D-BUS, Avahi etc. smarts.