![]() |
2009-10-01
, 03:25
|
|
Posts: 3,105 |
Thanked: 11,088 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Mountain View (CA, USA)
|
#2
|
![]() |
2009-10-02
, 11:34
|
|
Posts: 794 |
Thanked: 784 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ /Canada/Ontario/GTA
|
#3
|
From Under Development to Implemented
...
- It should go back to a previous status in the case that the software released is not distributed anymore, is totally unmaintained, etc.
![]() |
2009-10-02
, 15:13
|
|
Posts: 3,105 |
Thanked: 11,088 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Mountain View (CA, USA)
|
#4
|
![]() |
2009-10-02
, 15:16
|
|
Posts: 794 |
Thanked: 784 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ /Canada/Ontario/GTA
|
#5
|
![]() |
2009-10-02
, 18:37
|
|
Posts: 1,665 |
Thanked: 1,649 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Praha, Czech Republic
|
#6
|
![]() |
Tags |
brainstorm, criteria, progression |
|
I was going through some Brainstorms just now, and noticed one raised by zerojay, related to cellular data stats widgets. He mentioned in the comments section that the Brainstorm can be closed since an application was uploaded to extras-devel.
That got me thinking, do we have any criteria for progressing an idea to Under Development, and then to Implemented? In this case, a widget was created, and promoted to extras-devel. Should the Brainstorm move to Under Development until the widget gets moved to extras? In this case, there is no milestone either since it is not an enhancement to core Maemo. Is the logic for moving it to Under Development still OK in this case? I have not (as a Brainstorm mod) yet moved an idea, and was wondering what criteria should be used to move ideas to the next level.
Any thoughts? Thanks in advance.
Mobile Tablets Blog
Follow me on Twitter