Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 152 | Thanked: 6 times | Joined on Dec 2006
#1
I have an N800 w/ custom built kernel and everything is loaded from a 8GB SDHC card. It appear that the system is a little slugish on response after coming out of sleeping(kinda like me). Also, after boot up, my top read.
Code:
Mem: 118272K used, 8076K free, 0K shrd, 2096K buff, 76564K cached
Load average: 0.10, 0.05, 0.03    (State: S=sleeping R=running, W=waiting)
less than 8MB free, and 70+MB on cache? Is this normal, or you guys have any recommendation on what should we do to optimize the unit. Things to turn off, or *.conf to edit.
Thanks.
 
Karel Jansens's Avatar
Posts: 3,220 | Thanked: 326 times | Joined on Oct 2005 @ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)
#2
Originally Posted by freeman View Post
I have an N800 w/ custom built kernel and everything is loaded from a 8GB SDHC card. It appear that the system is a little slugish on response after coming out of sleeping(kinda like me). Also, after boot up, my top read.
Code:
Mem: 118272K used, 8076K free, 0K shrd, 2096K buff, 76564K cached
Load average: 0.10, 0.05, 0.03    (State: S=sleeping R=running, W=waiting)
less than 8MB free, and 70+MB on cache? Is this normal, or you guys have any recommendation on what should we do to optimize the unit. Things to turn off, or *.conf to edit.
Thanks.
If the N800's system behaves like a normal Linux system, those numbers are not uncommon at all. Linux has a rather intelligent memory manager; it wants all of your memory to be useful members of society and put in an honest day's job. If there are no applications demanding RAM, using it for cache is the next choice, just to keep it occupied.

But, as usual, smarter people might chime in now and expose my ignorance.
 
gnuite's Avatar
Posts: 1,245 | Thanked: 421 times | Joined on Dec 2005
#3
Karel Jansens is right. It is a feature of Linux (and many operating systems) that any file read from the file system is kept in memory for as long as possible, in case it needs to be accessed again. This is because file system access is (generally) much slower than RAM access.

"Cached" memory is basically free memory, though, since it has very low priority and will be trumped if applications need that memory for other purposes.

The load applet is aware of this and treats Cached memory as free memory.
 
Karel Jansens's Avatar
Posts: 3,220 | Thanked: 326 times | Joined on Oct 2005 @ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)
#4
Originally Posted by gnuite View Post
Karel Jansens is right.
AAAARGHHH!!!

 
brendan's Avatar
Posts: 531 | Thanked: 79 times | Joined on Oct 2006 @ This side of insane, that side of genius
#5
Originally Posted by Karel Jansens View Post
AAAARGHHH!!!

i thought this was open source/freeware/gpl code...

no need for pirates here...

bad pun, but i had too
__________________
Nokia n800
OS 2008
Pharos iGPS 360-BT
ElmScan 5 BlueTooth
BlackBerry Bold (9000)
AT&T Wireless
 
Karel Jansens's Avatar
Posts: 3,220 | Thanked: 326 times | Joined on Oct 2005 @ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)
#6
Originally Posted by brendan View Post
i thought this was open source/freeware/gpl code...

no need for pirates here...

bad pun, but i had too
Nonono! For the pun to work, I would have had to write: "Aarrh! me matey!" and sneak a parrot in somewhere.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:52.