![]() |
2009-11-03
, 20:58
|
Posts: 607 |
Thanked: 450 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Washington, DC
|
#22
|
![]() |
2009-11-03
, 20:58
|
|
Posts: 1,366 |
Thanked: 1,185 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
|
#23
|
I have more confidence in Google as software developer than in Nokia. While Android is not THE answer for mobile devices it definitely keeps making progress. Nokia on the other hand seems to look at software as necessary evil to sell hardware. I still have the feeling that I wouldn't be surprised if Nokia kills Maemo in favor of some other low profile project I haven't heard of.
One of the reason why I don't have an Android device is that I haven't found one that I like. If I had the choice, I would buy a N900 running Android.
![]() |
2009-11-03
, 21:40
|
Posts: 24 |
Thanked: 22 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Spain
|
#24
|
I've used Android for a bit and it's rather slick. In some ways, to me, a better and more successful OS.
Everyone here that keeps bashing Google better give up their gmail, google calendar, youtube, google docs, google voice, picasa and google search engine - otherwise the constant bashing and fear-mongering is really a joke on themselves.That and it's getting reeeaallly old.
Personally, I use a lot of Google's products. Not because of what company it came from - but because they work well for me.
I take the same approach when buying a phone, OS or tablet.
The Following User Says Thank You to GodLikeCreature For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-11-03
, 21:46
|
Posts: 607 |
Thanked: 450 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Washington, DC
|
#25
|
![]() |
2009-11-03
, 22:04
|
|
Posts: 1,366 |
Thanked: 1,185 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
|
#26
|
Reading this (and many other) threads discussing alternative OSs brings a question to my mind. Nokia has maintained that the N900 is just a step towards a future killer product. The assumption here is that it is an N1000 (or whatever) running Maemo 6. But it could be an N100 running the next version of Symbian.
Perhaps Maemo 5 and the N900 are a stalking horse to determine where Nokia should drive their cash cow, Symbian. The move to put both Maemo and Symbian under Qt could be designed to ease the transition of Maemo developers to Symbian.
Thoughts?
P.S. As one who buys what is rather than what is promised, I have no problem with that. I will (or won't) buy an N900 based on what the competition is next year when I'm planning to upgrade and I doubt the next big Nokia thing will be available then.
The Following User Says Thank You to mikec For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-11-03
, 22:11
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#27
|
![]() |
2009-11-03
, 22:17
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#28
|
![]() |
2009-11-03
, 23:13
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#29
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-11-03
, 23:21
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#30
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: | ||
One of the reason why I don't have an Android device is that I haven't found one that I like. If I had the choice, I would buy a N900 running Android.