Active Topics

 



Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 4,556 | Thanked: 1,624 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#1
Is there anyone who has the n900 that has lots of emails (100+) that are being synced via IMAP? How is the performance on that, and once its synced, and you go offline does it store a local copy of the recent emails?

I don't get to do deletion on my accounts that often (busy busy). Part of the reason why I'm buying the n900 is so I can keep up to date with emails. But I was wondering if I should go with a POP solution or a IMAP solution, my current gmail and hotmail accounts are a mix of both but I was thinking of switching them all to IMAP that way everything is synchronized. (though when Thunderbird downloads them they're still not marked as read already...)
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
They're maemo and MeeGo...

"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
 
Andre Klapper's Avatar
Posts: 1,665 | Thanked: 1,649 times | Joined on Jun 2008 @ Praha, Czech Republic
#2
There are some issues filed in bugs.maemo.org with regard to large mailboxes. It's being worked on.
__________________
maemo.org Bugmaster
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Andre Klapper For This Useful Post:
Posts: 96 | Thanked: 23 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Sweden
#3
I think that I cannot have any other way than IMAP on the N900 due to that if using POP the emails will be D/L and deleted on the server = then the N900 have to be my MAIN computer...maybe I am wrong but that is how I see it.
IMAP = emails stay on the server
POP = get D/L to the device and erased on server
__________________
Will the N900 be the loooooooong awaited replacement for my old N95 1st Gen ?
 
edgar2's Avatar
Moderator | Posts: 199 | Thanked: 264 times | Joined on May 2009 @ turku, finland
#4
Originally Posted by McChicken View Post
IMAP = emails stay on the server
POP = get D/L to the device and erased on server
it does not have to be that way. you can tell the pop server to leave the messages after retrieval.


Last edited by edgar2; 2009-11-06 at 10:32.
 
edgar2's Avatar
Moderator | Posts: 199 | Thanked: 264 times | Joined on May 2009 @ turku, finland
#5
Originally Posted by Laughing Man View Post
Is there anyone who has the n900 that has lots of emails (100+) that are being synced via IMAP? How is the performance on that, and once its synced, and you go offline does it store a local copy of the recent emails?

I don't get to do deletion on my accounts that often (busy busy). Part of the reason why I'm buying the n900 is so I can keep up to date with emails. But I was wondering if I should go with a POP solution or a IMAP solution, my current gmail and hotmail accounts are a mix of both but I was thinking of switching them all to IMAP that way everything is synchronized. (though when Thunderbird downloads them they're still not marked as read already...)
as andre said, there are some issues reported with imap and large number of mails. at the moment i solved it by moving all inbox messages to a subfolder (inboxarchive). that way day-to-day email is snappy and pleasant. when browsing large number of emails eventually gets convenient i might move old mails back from the subfolder again (which, i should add, is still accessible on the n900).
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to edgar2 For This Useful Post:
yerga's Avatar
Posts: 696 | Thanked: 1,012 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Asturies, Spain
#6
Also, the reported performance problems are with folders >10000 emails.
I have some folders with 1000-2000 emails and it works fairly well.
__________________
Daniel Martín Yerga
maemo.org profile
Twitter
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to yerga For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,418 | Thanked: 1,541 times | Joined on Feb 2008
#7
 
Posts: 4,556 | Thanked: 1,624 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#8
Originally Posted by yerga View Post
Also, the reported performance problems are with folders >10000 emails.
I have some folders with 1000-2000 emails and it works fairly well.
Ah ok, my concern was more around the 500-1000 level, not 10000 emails.
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
They're maemo and MeeGo...

"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
 
Posts: 474 | Thanked: 283 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Oxford, UK
#9
Originally Posted by Laughing Man View Post
Ah ok, my concern was more around the 500-1000 level, not 10000 emails.
My inbox has 12000 mails, and you should see the other 400 or so folders :-)

At least I don't receive 1000 spams per day plus 5000 backscatters like I did a few years ago. Yay for improved spam filtering and greylisting :-)
 
Posts: 474 | Thanked: 283 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Oxford, UK
#10
Fwiw, I expect I will continue keeping my main inbox on my server, and filtering emails heavily so that only personal and work contacts, and replies to things I have written on mailing lists, are forwarded to my N900. The rest will be accessible on the server as usual, but not shouting their beepy goodness at me on the N900 through the day.

Oh dear, I'm quite looking forward to designing my personal info-handling workflow. I think I might be becoming a geek ;-)
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:36.