![]() |
2007-03-06
, 09:17
|
|
Posts: 2,853 |
Thanked: 968 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
|
#32
|
![]() |
2007-03-06
, 23:03
|
|
Posts: 880 |
Thanked: 264 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#33
|
![]() |
2007-03-07
, 07:17
|
Posts: 85 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Hertfordshire, UK
|
#34
|
![]() |
2007-03-07
, 09:51
|
Posts: 3 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
|
#35
|
![]() |
2007-04-05
, 21:47
|
Posts: 5 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Apr 2007
|
#36
|
![]() |
2007-05-29
, 17:25
|
Posts: 73 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Apr 2007
|
#37
|
So, let me make sure I understand what Gourmet is saying. I have been trying to get Gizmo on my N800 to coonect *directly* to my Asterisk server on the same subnet. I've been watching the Asterisk logs, and see no SIP registration attempts form my Gizmo/N800 combination, nor do I see any progress toward outbound call completion when an outbound call is placed from Gizmo using the 'secondary' account. Am I reading the postings in this group correctly, when I conclude that the Gizmo client on the N800 does not use SIP to connect directly to the secondary account, but rather causes the Gizmo servers to make that connectionn on its behalf?
If this is the case, what real SIP clients are currently working on the N800?
![]() |
2007-07-01
, 06:44
|
|
Posts: 15 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Jun 2007
@ cape cood
|
#38
|
![]() |
2007-07-04
, 17:42
|
Posts: 23 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Jun 2007
|
#39
|
![]() |
2007-07-06
, 18:12
|
|
Posts: 23 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Jun 2007
@ Rochester, NY
|
#40
|
If this is the case, what real SIP clients are currently working on the N800?