![]() |
2009-11-21
, 20:14
|
|
Posts: 1,540 |
Thanked: 1,045 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
|
#32
|
The Following User Says Thank You to krisse For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-11-21
, 20:17
|
|
Posts: 1,665 |
Thanked: 1,649 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Praha, Czech Republic
|
#33
|
If there's a common configuration mistake which everyone makes, then that too is a bug, it's a design bug and should be treated just like any other bug.
![]() |
2009-11-21
, 20:18
|
|
Posts: 71 |
Thanked: 54 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#34
|
I don't want another system that is used for "bringing the initial reports into a valuable state before copying them to Bugzilla".
I prefer this to be done in Bugzilla itself.
As said already: It's not about filing the perfect bug report in Bugzilla. If people are afraid of doing something wrong when filing a report in Bugzilla I wonder how to change this. Maybe by a "If you are unsure just pick up something"?
![]() |
2009-11-21
, 20:23
|
|
Posts: 1,665 |
Thanked: 1,649 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Praha, Czech Republic
|
#35
|
Long list of ways that Bugzilla is user-unfriendly:
-This page does not properly explain where people are meant to report a problem with their device: https://bugs.maemo.org/enter_bug.cgi Which ordinary user knows what a repo is? Who is going to know who "Maemo Devices" are? Who is going to know which apps are managed by them? For a specific example, which category would a browser bug be reported in?
-How is someone supposed to know the priority of a problem?
-How is someone supposed to know what terms like "QA Contact", "Assign To", "Alias" mean? I know these don't have to be filled in, but these all add to the scariness of the site, as if it isn't really intended for consumers' eyes.
-Which OS are people supposed to report, the OS on their computer or the OS on their device? And what if they use several OSes on their computers? And why do they have to even give the OS of their computer if the problem is on their device?
-What does "version" mean? Assuming it means the OS version on their device, how on earth are ordinary users supposed to know what version number they have?
-What are they supposed to put in the URL box? And does everyone actually know what URL means?
-Why does the bug report button say "commit", as if it's some kind of nuclear weapon launch system?
-Why does the bug report window include scary cryptic strings of characters like "User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)"? (I know what this all means, but an ordinary user would be baffled by it.)
The Following User Says Thank You to Andre Klapper For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-11-21
, 20:42
|
|
Posts: 2,173 |
Thanked: 2,678 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Cornwall, UK
|
#36
|
The Following User Says Thank You to RevdKathy For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-11-21
, 21:42
|
|
Posts: 2,535 |
Thanked: 6,681 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ UK
|
#37
|
What I find missing from that s/sheet is a 'Due Date'-column, that's pretty standard in any project management efforts - how else do you track if you are on-track or not and/or set some expecations for 'customers'?
The Following User Says Thank You to Jaffa For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-11-21
, 21:43
|
|
Posts: 2,669 |
Thanked: 2,555 times |
Joined on Apr 2007
|
#38
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to zerojay For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-11-22
, 04:04
|
|
Posts: 1,540 |
Thanked: 1,045 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
|
#39
|
Moving away from Bugzilla to anything else means getting nothing but a bunch of vague bugs from people going "it doesn't work - FIX IT".
That's why Bugzilla asks for all the info that it does... because while the user may not understand the relevance of all the info, you never know when the developer might pick out a bit of info that makes things so much clearer to him.
If there's anything you don't understand, just leave it alone and someone else such as Andre will come along and fix things or ask additional questions to fill in the blanks.
Bugzilla just looks intimidating until you understand a little bit more about how bugs are fixed and documented. I know it's somewhat intimidating at first, but once you've entered a bug or two and you get a feel for it, you'll see it's not anywhere near as bad as you've been saying.
![]() |
2009-11-22
, 04:06
|
|
Posts: 1,540 |
Thanked: 1,045 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
|
#40
|
Device - either a Nokia device, or the OS on their computer in case of reporting an SDK bug. Any idea how to make this clearer?
The bugs I've championed on Bugzilla have been things that technical experts wouldn't consider bugs, such as the flash-shutdown, the fit-with-to-view etc. I was reporting them because I got so much feedback from ordinary users on Tablet School. If I hadn't been listening to ordinary users they wouldn't have been reported at all.
If there was a proper Nokia support forum for ordinary users to talk about it that would be great, but there isn't. There is a discussion forum on the Nokia website but there's never any official response to support problems. And trying to get a reply from Nokia's direct support numbers is highly inefficient because they will have to deal with each person one at a time.
It would make a lot more sense to have ordinary users report their bugs to a central list, and if they see the bug already listed then they could vote for it instead of repeating it. And that's what sites like Brainstorm do.