![]() |
2009-12-02
, 08:54
|
Posts: 219 |
Thanked: 94 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Helsinki, Finland
|
#2
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to naabi For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-12-02
, 16:02
|
Posts: 607 |
Thanked: 450 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Washington, DC
|
#3
|
I think a basic thing is the "users who installed this installed also..." feature. Search results should be sortable e.g. by popularity, release date, rating, most commented etc.. To provide even better search results you need to build some kind of ontology, which helps to prioritize results and to find correct answers even if search words do not match. Ontologies contain e.g. parent and sibling relations of content, and ideally this information would be from maemo.org users. Maintaing this kind of information is too big a task for administrators.
The Following User Says Thank You to DaveP1 For This Useful Post: | ||
Much of that is to do with payment, which is not something our community needs to worry about (but Ovi may want to take note). But there were some things raised that we do need to watch in our own community.
"Eighty-two percent of those surveyed indicated the design of the Android Marketplace makes it difficult for apps to be noticed". I suspect that this is a little bit like "Eighty-two percent of turkeys suggested Christmas/Thanksgiving should be abolished" -- after all, every developer thinks the app store should be arranged so that their app comes out on top (co-incidentally, of course). But there is probably some truth behind it
If the N900 is as successful as I hope, then there will be lots of applications in Maemo Downloads. We need to think about how we continuously improve the way people can find applications they are interested in. I would be interested to see ideas for how we can make Downloads even more effective as the number of apps increases.
Graham