![]() |
2007-03-26
, 14:00
|
|
Posts: 3,220 |
Thanked: 326 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)
|
#51
|
![]() |
2007-03-26
, 14:13
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#52
|
@Penguinbait:
1st, we don't have a return policy here. 2nd, I purchased the device as an quick-online-web-checking kind of a thing were a laptop would be to much trouble. I've read quite a few reviews before deciding to buy one. That's the reason I didn't buy an N770 in the first place! And thats's why I said I was dissappointed. It's not the 'quick-online bla bla' thing I thought it would be.
I am a bit of a gadget freak, I have a lot of them lying around. Most of them work as designed/marketed, but the N800 clearly does not. My girlfriend for instance cannot use the device like it's suppose to:
"It says: Internet Browser closed unexpectedly, did I do something wrong"? No dear, you have to start it up again, and try again. Eventually it'll work. I think...
"It says: Weather updating. But I can't start anything."
Oh, just power cycle it, that's normal...
etc etc
Sorry, but that's not a market ready device. She won't even touch it now and starts up the laptop instead.
Tweaking/hacking the device won't cure problems like that.
As for the device being Linux: the problem here is stability. That has nothing to do with the OS at all. I hate Windows Mobile, and yet, it always does what I expect it to do. It doesn't crash/hang/freeze/reboot/bad touch screen on me. Ever. Like my (antique) Palm, my gameboy, my celular phone, my calculator and a lot more portable devices. They are flawed, but work as aspected.
This thing isn't stable. Not even close. Period. Don't start discussing wether or not I should've bought it in the first place, that's not the point here.
I agree: new users should test this device. A good device sells itself. A bad device doesn't.
![]() |
2007-03-26
, 14:16
|
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ A moon of planet Nokia
|
#53
|
![]() |
2007-03-26
, 14:30
|
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ A moon of planet Nokia
|
#54
|
I understand and agree with much of the frustration here. However, many of the counterpoints have validity too. Your statement that the N800 is "never" stable is just flat wrong. It is far too subjective a remark to be cast out that broadly.
![]() |
2007-03-26
, 14:36
|
|
Posts: 355 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Helsinki, Finland
|
#55
|
![]() |
2007-03-26
, 14:36
|
Posts: 3,401 |
Thanked: 1,255 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ London, UK
|
#56
|
The point was and is: the device is flawed and some of us think that that's not something you might expect from a €400,- device.
And that's something you agree to or not. But why people start discussions in this thread about 50Mb's ISO's I can't understand.
![]() |
2007-03-26
, 14:38
|
Posts: 3,401 |
Thanked: 1,255 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ London, UK
|
#57
|
My point exactly. How many of you developers out there paid the full retail price for the N800? I would guess not many, however those that do expect a bit more. Since I have had my new N800 (my second), and after upgrading. It has rebooted itself once while watching a video. Now I am wondering, was it the video that caused this, was it the upgraded software, was it the moon streaking across the sky, or sea tides. No idea. The thing is, for the money, more is expected.
![]() |
2007-03-26
, 14:44
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#58
|
Agreed. Well, the device is marketed as an Internet Tablet. So it's 'core business' is Internet browsing. Let me rectify my broad remark a bit then:
The Internet browsing on the N800 can't be called stable.
Would be buyers should try one before they make the purchase. Like I said, a good device sells itself. That's not a rant but quite reasonable I think.
![]() |
2007-03-26
, 14:46
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#59
|
That "developer" chip you have on your shoulder must be causing you considerable mobility problems.
![]() |
2007-03-26
, 15:04
|
|
Posts: 355 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Helsinki, Finland
|
#60
|
That "developer" chip you have on your shoulder must be causing you considerable mobility problems.