![]() |
2009-12-28
, 08:05
|
Posts: 279 |
Thanked: 95 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#21
|
The Following User Says Thank You to asidana For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-12-28
, 08:20
|
|
Posts: 2,173 |
Thanked: 2,678 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Cornwall, UK
|
#22
|
eric what i am talking about is nothing to do with protocol. feature provided by the client. i dont know the backgorund but i assume locally deleted messages gets deleted from the server on next update/sync.
The Following User Says Thank You to RevdKathy For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-12-28
, 11:56
|
Posts: 33 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ North West England
|
#23
|
![]() |
2009-12-28
, 12:17
|
Posts: 279 |
Thanked: 95 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#24
|
Thanks for everybody's replies.
Please taken note of my comment that this worked perfectly on my E90: emails I deleted using 'from server' on the phone, when synch'd, also deleted from the server. And emails I deleted from the server after synching, once re-synch'd, deleted from the phone.
Basically the most recent activity in the inbox was updated on the other device (devices being server and phone).
So whether it's POP3 that allows this or a protocol on the phone, it's not working on the N900.
![]() |
2009-12-28
, 14:19
|
Posts: 670 |
Thanked: 747 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Kansas City, Missouri, USA
|
#25
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Crashdamage For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-12-29
, 11:45
|
Posts: 33 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ North West England
|
#26
|
![]() |
2009-12-29
, 11:57
|
|
Posts: 1,366 |
Thanked: 1,185 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
|
#27
|
Modest on N900 simply doesn't do that and for me, it is one of the fundamental usability options that an email client must have
![]() |
2009-12-29
, 12:23
|
Posts: 6 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Brisbane, Australia
|
#28
|
![]() |
2009-12-29
, 12:25
|
|
Posts: 1,217 |
Thanked: 446 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Bedfordshire, UK
|
#29
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Fargus For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-12-29
, 12:28
|
|
Posts: 1,366 |
Thanked: 1,185 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
|
#30
|
There seems to be a fundamental discussion on the abilities of POP3. The RFC is available via Google: Post Office Protocol - Version 3
There is explicit reference to the DELE Command which marks the message for deletion. However, this delete is not actioned until the connection enters an UPDATE state (usually by disconecting). This is something familiar to S60 users.
I believe (but open to correction) that by default Modest does not issue an UPDATE state request and therefore this action would not happen unless the user manually chooses to disconnect an account.
The normal expected Use Case for POP3 client interaction would be to run through AUTHORIZATION state then TRANSACTION state (including marking for deletion) then UPDATE state (to perform required actions including pending deletions).
I suspect that the issue here is that Modest is either not passing the DELE action to the POP server. If the QUIT command were not being issued then this might also cause the issue but network sniffing would be simplest route to discovering this issue.
Despite several comments this is a TRANSACTION command in the POP3 command set and not one of the optional POP3 Commands.
My conclusion is therefore that this is technically a bug or a usability issue if someone can find a means to manually disconnect form a POP3 connection in modest and find the markers enacted as expected.
Any comments?