|
2010-01-07
, 18:47
|
|
Posts: 1,309 |
Thanked: 1,187 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
|
#92
|
|
2010-01-07
, 18:51
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#93
|
Also... This site, I mean "talk" specifically, isn't a volunteer community any more! It is maemo.org - the best resource for finding/downloading software for maemo products. The best resource for reading more about bugs, and definitively the best resource for fixing them. I doubt 5% of the people that use maemo.org and talk.maemo.org contribute in form of code.
It's a user community. May not be ment to be, and may not have started out as one, but now it is.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to fatalsaint For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-01-07
, 18:53
|
|
Posts: 2,173 |
Thanked: 2,678 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Cornwall, UK
|
#94
|
I have two things I'd like to mention.
One: Is is possible that these people are trying to be the squeaky wheel? Perhaps they assume (right or wrong) that Nokia pays some attention to this community and perhaps if Nokia sees enough consternation about *insert what you please* they will fix it, or at least are more likely to fix it.
The Following User Says Thank You to RevdKathy For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-01-07
, 18:54
|
|
Posts: 1,309 |
Thanked: 1,187 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
|
#95
|
Some criticism is valuable, but some of it isn't.
Criticism in the true sense of the word ought to be totally factual and unemotional, but a lot of the time it's just used as an excuse for being insulting or provocative.
How is starting a thread saying "this community/device/platform sucks" valuable?
How is accusing the entire forum of being "fanbois" valuable?
How is implying that a device or platform is "garbage" valuable?
|
2010-01-07
, 18:59
|
Posts: 177 |
Thanked: 43 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
@ Gainesville, FL
|
#96
|
The problem with that is that it has repeatedly been stated that as far as Nokia are concerned the organs of feedback are Bugzilla and Brainstorm. Most of the people making most noise are unwilling to use those, even with help or support.
Nokia don't take much notice of what happens on t.m.o. If it's not in Bugzilla, it's not a bug. It would be impossible to count the number of posts made directing people to Bugzilla but they prefer to go on ranting.
|
2010-01-07
, 19:06
|
|
Posts: 2,173 |
Thanked: 2,678 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Cornwall, UK
|
#97
|
Ok, all makes sense. So my next question is...do any of you (responsible members of the community) check whether there are any bugs and/or genuine issues that deserve to be address that show up here in the rants but are not present in Bugzilla? And I don't mean in a systematic documented this-is-my-job sort of way, I mean, what have observed? Are the subjects of most of the rants (the ones that actually have subjects) documented either Bugzilla or Brainstorm?
|
2010-01-07
, 19:06
|
|
Posts: 1,309 |
Thanked: 1,187 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
|
#98
|
This is wrong.
I'll use RevdKathy as an example.. I hope she doesn't mind. (...) We all volunteer to be here.. nobody is forced.
As for this now being a user forum: that sounds like a case being made for separating the volunteer/developer community off from the users - and I personally believe that would be a tragedy.
|
2010-01-07
, 19:07
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#99
|
|
2010-01-07
, 19:08
|
|
Posts: 2,173 |
Thanked: 2,678 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Cornwall, UK
|
#100
|
Tags |
cars and radios, community, constructive criticism, critcism, criticizing criticism, critiquing critiques, maemo.org, maturity, on fanning trolls, on trolling fans, talk, talk.maemo.org |
|
Criticism in the true sense of the word ought to be totally factual and unemotional, but a lot of the time it's just used as an excuse for being insulting or provocative.
How is starting a thread saying "this community/device/platform sucks" valuable?
How is accusing the entire forum of being "fanbois" valuable?
How is implying that a device or platform is "garbage" valuable?