Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 474 | Thanked: 283 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Oxford, UK
#11
Darn, I bought the N900 because I thought it was the most open...

Actually I'm very pleased with my choice, and I've no wish to depend heavily on the Google mothership for services anyway.

But, honestly, if I had heard the SFLS discussion a few months ago, there's a good chance I would have been persuaded to the other side.
 
Posts: 68 | Thanked: 24 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#12
Am I wrong if I assume we're going to be running lots more userspace apps that are free software on Maemo than Android users? That isn't meaningless either, IMO.

Here's some more info on what exactly isn't free and where Maemo is trying to go with this, one of those wiki pages is outdated and the other definitely needs work to be a bit more clear:
http://maemo.org/community/maemo-dev...free_packages/

Last edited by slux; 2010-01-21 at 08:39.
 
Posts: 72 | Thanked: 21 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#13
guys - the N900 is not a phone - it is a computer so cant really be in the running...... *ROFL*
 
Posts: 755 | Thanked: 406 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ UK
#14
Everyone saying that the n900 is not a phone seems like a bit of a cop-out to me. It is also a phone, so I'm looking forward to it being the best phone it can be. With all of it's computer-y goodness too.
 
Posts: 72 | Thanked: 21 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#15
Originally Posted by codeMonkey View Post
Everyone saying that the n900 is not a phone seems like a bit of a cop-out to me. It is also a phone, so I'm looking forward to it being the best phone it can be. With all of it's computer-y goodness too.
I agree - I was being sarcastic...
 
Posts: 47 | Thanked: 28 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#16
Isn't Symbian also in process of becoming totally open? And it's also used by many companies
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#17
Open aint just about code. Governance plays a big part, too, and Android falls flat on its face there.
__________________
Ryan Abel
 
Posts: 3,428 | Thanked: 2,856 times | Joined on Jul 2008
#18
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
Open aint just about code. Governance plays a big part, too, and Android falls flat on its face there.
This I wholeheartedly agree with.

But they are both factors... so I can see why some people might call android "more open" than Maemo as a sales pitch just because the source is more open.

Android itself is not the problem.. but Google is in no way a Nokia. When Google starts allowing their phones to be rooted with an app in the official google market.... then we'd have something to truly discuss about "openness".
__________________
If I've helped you or you use any of my packages feel free to help me out.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maintaining:
pyRadio - Pandora Radio on your N900, N810 or N800!
 
Posts: 543 | Thanked: 181 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Universe,LocalCluster.MilkyWay.Sol.Earth.Europe.Slovenia.Ljubljana
#19
I'm seriously having issues seeing Android as more Free... it uses Java if I'm not mistaken... and that last I checked still wasn't fully Freed from preprietary bits and pieces.
__________________
For any repos or anything else I might have working on my N900 see:
http://wiki.maemo.org/User:Ruskie
A quick list of what I have in the repos
zsh|xmms2|fcron|gtar|gcoreutils
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#20
Originally Posted by ruskie View Post
I'm seriously having issues seeing Android as more Free... it uses Java if I'm not mistaken... and that last I checked still wasn't fully Freed from preprietary bits and pieces.
Another factor when qualifying "openness" is compatibility and platform lock-in. With Android, you're using a completely custom Google application environment. No X, no recognizable desktop toolkits. Hell, the Java isn't even quite right. In sum, that means that applications you program for Android only run on Android (VM porting doesn't really count here).

Maemo's advantage here comes with its compatibility with desktop Linux. It has X, it has GTK+ and Qt. Applications you program for Maemo are easy to run on other platforms (especially with Qt)—Linux, OS X, Windows, Symbian—and applications for these platforms (especially Linux GTK+/Qt stuff) are easily ported to Maemo.

Tools you recognize on an ecosystem that isn't designed to lock you in to a vendor's platform.
__________________
Ryan Abel
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:49.