Active Topics

 



Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 174 | Thanked: 99 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#101
As much as I like Fennec I still don't think its as strong as MicroB.

Flash is disabled, No Volume Key Zoom Control, No Spin Zoom Control, Takes Too Long To Load Compared To MicroB.
All of which I think are pretty important.

That Browser-Switchboard is cool though, I'm liking it.
 
Posts: 41 | Thanked: 3 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Kirkland, WA
#102
I agree it's nowhere near Microb as far as usability and speed. But I use Firefox on my laptop and I like the uniformity. I'm also loving weave. Even though Fennec has a long way to go, I still find myself using it over Microb.
 
Posts: 27 | Thanked: 3 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#103
agree good browser, however MicroB is faster and has flash enable. I was not able to enable flash on FF even after changing the recommended setting to false. Once FF has flash enable and is much faster, I might switch brower...the positive FF does render pages better that MicroB.
 
Posts: 5,795 | Thanked: 3,151 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Agoura Hills Calif
#104
As far as weave goes, it should be easy to run Fennec, install Weave, and export the bookmarks for use by Microb.

I am amazed that you can stand the slowness of Fennec compared to the default browser.
 
ToJa92's Avatar
Posts: 1,091 | Thanked: 323 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ ~
#105
Originally Posted by geneven View Post
As far as weave goes, it should be easy to run Fennec, install Weave, and export the bookmarks for use by Microb.

I am amazed that you can stand the slowness of Fennec compared to the default browser.
I run Fennec as my standard browser(or, well, I have not yet used the applet to switch but I only click Fennec for browsing). Mainly because of Weave, but also I like add-ons. I think it's barely slower than MicroB. But maybe that's just me.
 
Posts: 38 | Thanked: 7 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Milton, WI, US
#106
Just upped the browser cache to 16mb. Testing. 4096 helped alot, but I re-disabled flash almost immediately. Worked great, just seemed way slower. Anyone having any luck making it snappier?
 
Posts: 38 | Thanked: 7 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Milton, WI, US
#107
Originally Posted by jscribble View Post
Just upped the browser cache to 16mb. Testing.
Not liking it. *Might* be a bit too much. Pages load slightly slower, but are fully scrollable once loaded.

Testing 8mb now.
 
Posts: 1,141 | Thanked: 781 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Magical Unicorn Land
#108
Originally Posted by Rushmore View Post
I have both flagged as false, but Flash vids still do not work. Strange.
Me too. In fact flash doesn't even work on youtube, even with the add-on. Weird.
 
Posts: 138 | Thanked: 103 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Southern Germany
#109
Originally Posted by stlpaul View Post
Me too. In fact flash doesn't even work on youtube, even with the add-on. Weird.
Same here.
 
Posts: 38 | Thanked: 7 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Milton, WI, US
#110
Much better with 8mb cache. Playing with network pipelining settings and smiling more!
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:52.