![]() |
2010-02-03
, 18:29
|
Posts: 277 |
Thanked: 46 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#2
|
The Following User Says Thank You to planetf1 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-02-03
, 18:32
|
Posts: 242 |
Thanked: 97 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#3
|
![]() |
2010-02-03
, 18:57
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#4
|
![]() |
2010-02-03
, 18:57
|
|
Posts: 1,091 |
Thanked: 323 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ ~
|
#5
|
![]() |
2010-02-03
, 19:23
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#6
|
![]() |
2010-02-03
, 20:03
|
Posts: 5,335 |
Thanked: 8,187 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Pennsylvania, USA
|
#7
|
It also amazes me how much he is involved in other projects too.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-02-03
, 20:10
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#8
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-02-03
, 21:54
|
|
Posts: 682 |
Thanked: 208 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ UK
|
#9
|
It's clearly firefox derived, and has been optimized for maemo. Indeed it works very very well
I was surprised to see a rather large performance difference between fennec and microb. Since their both using the same rendering engine (aren't they?) this implies it's probably just a matter of time before fennec catches up
Or is there something else at work here -- is microb using any proprietary components perhaps with additional video acceleration?
Only reason I'm wondering is that microb will probably remain fairly similar, whilst fennec will evolve rapidly, and in the world of the web that could become important -- for example youtube's recent foray into html5+h.264 -- things that microb doesn't (yet?) support (I think)