The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to VDVsx For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-03-08
, 15:42
|
|
Posts: 1,665 |
Thanked: 1,649 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Praha, Czech Republic
|
#2
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Andre Klapper For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-03-08
, 15:46
|
|
Posts: 1,559 |
Thanked: 1,786 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Boston
|
#3
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Flandry For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-03-08
, 16:05
|
|
Posts: 3,203 |
Thanked: 1,391 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Worthing, England
|
#4
|
![]() |
2010-03-08
, 16:07
|
|
Posts: 3,203 |
Thanked: 1,391 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Worthing, England
|
#5
|
![]() |
2010-03-08
, 16:12
|
|
Posts: 1,070 |
Thanked: 1,604 times |
Joined on Sep 2008
@ Helsinki
|
#6
|
Yeah i agree, having the types listed is a good idea.
I'd like to see a way of linking some of the great tutorials to the pages like bugtracking etc... so the process can be followed through from beginning to end. Its the little snags like the bugtracker link that have added a week onto my first attempt. But does also prove that if we tighten things up a bit, new coders can almost have an app in extras in under a month... (Not sure if that is good, but feels good to me!)
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to VDVsx For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-03-08
, 16:12
|
|
Posts: 3,203 |
Thanked: 1,391 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Worthing, England
|
#7
|
We are also working in a checklist for developers with all the links, in order to smooth the testing process: http://wiki.maemo.org/Prepare_your_a...on_for_testing
![]() |
2010-03-08
, 16:24
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#8
|
I do have a slightly different opinion. as much as i agree with bug tracking etc... for small projects it isn't allways needed. And after battling through QT and Python, the last thing i wanted was to have to learn Bugtracker, get another login, remember to visit it etc... (OK it's not that bad, as it emails you) - but doesnt portray a nice image to first timers.
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to benny1967 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-03-08
, 16:28
|
Posts: 5,335 |
Thanked: 8,187 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Pennsylvania, USA
|
#9
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-03-08
, 16:36
|
|
Posts: 3,203 |
Thanked: 1,391 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Worthing, England
|
#10
|
I'm just very sad how many developers (good developers of useful application) just seem to insist on not following the rules. When I find a project I would love to see in Extras, I cannot vote it up because it's just not "ready". I dgon't know why devs do something like that, even if you tell them how to correct the problem easily.
since some developers aren't taking seriously the QA rules and there's a lot of room for different interpretations in some cases, like the validity of the bugtracker fields, the Testing Squad decided to write some additional rules to clarify dubious situations: http://wiki.maemo.org/Bugtracker
These rules aren't final and need to be approved by the community as usual, this is just a call for further discussion.
Discussion at -Community ML: http://n2.nabble.com/Validity-criter....html#a4695909
Valério Valério
www.valeriovalerio.org
Last edited by VDVsx; 2010-03-08 at 15:48. Reason: ML link