![]() |
2010-04-08
, 17:21
|
Posts: 225 |
Thanked: 64 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#52
|
Or for the people that has the patience and the knowledge on how to search the internet...
![]() |
2010-04-08
, 17:23
|
Posts: 225 |
Thanked: 64 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#53
|
![]() |
2010-04-08
, 17:35
|
Posts: 225 |
Thanked: 64 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#54
|
PINSH -
I'm guessing you mean that question in curiosity, and not to sound like a smart *** (the internet sure can misconstrue these things) but for me the problem is not C++ vs C#, but rather which direction to go get to the damned IDE. One tutorial I was looking at showed you just type all this stuff at a command prompt?
1. a breif explanation as to how maemo development works. what talks to what, to talk to what.
2. a breif explanation on the different methods you can do to begin developement, and possibly their pros and cons (from what I have been reading there are 2 or 3 ways to make apps for these things)
also needed is some explaining on why sometimes you need to include the things you include
and how optifying works
how the repositories work (as far as developing and registering your app into one), how the bug tracker works, how the project pages work
I couldn't program my way out of a paper bag when it came to this Maemo beast.
![]() |
2010-04-08
, 18:03
|
Posts: 78 |
Thanked: 17 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#55
|
I think the primary mistake here is assuming that Nokia, from the outset, was intending to push into the realm of the iPhone with the N900. They pulled directly from their internet tablet line, and -still- hold the N97 as their flagship device, which does have reliable access to the Ovi store along with all of their other phones.
Also, a huge part of the developmental frameworks as they exist in Maemo 5 are open source, so Nokia can only apply so much pressure here. In a sense this is why they're moving to Qt, so that they can give you the static, unchanging API you need for closed applications.
I'd say that their strategy was to step Maemo from WiFi only to WiFi + GSM data network. Then it was strangely successful and attracted people who didn't look at where it came from, only at what others were doing, thinking Nokia was intent on doing the same.
What do you consider "proper development?"
To be totally fair, the Application Manager is effecively just a front end for apt and dpkg. It's not designed to do any of that.
I think there's a large number of people who came thinking that Maemo was just like Android, built from the ground up to be a Phone OS with an App Store ready to go just like them, then don't bother to look at where it came from and the community that was already here.
![]() |
2010-04-08
, 18:12
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#56
|
Seeit just doesnt go any where on this forum, ppl here will just defend nokia & their strategies blindly and no fact or figure would effect their views.
Professionals on this forum have accepted the shortcomings of nokia.
![]() |
2010-04-08
, 18:14
|
Posts: 78 |
Thanked: 17 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#57
|
![]() |
2010-04-08
, 18:16
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#58
|
![]() |
2010-04-08
, 18:27
|
Posts: 78 |
Thanked: 17 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#59
|
So what you're saying is that we can't make a point you'll ever accept, and we're always going to be deluded.
I'm not disappointed with my N900, therefore I have my head in the sand. Thank you for telling me the true state of my subconscious, regret filled mind.
Well it's not like we can force Nokia to do stuff, now can we? However, I chose Nokia because unlike, say, Apple they don't dictate what I can do with my device and they don't reinvent the wheel like Android.
You're complaining about Nokia. maemo.org is not Nokia.
![]() |
2010-04-08
, 18:28
|
Posts: 78 |
Thanked: 17 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#60
|
![]() |
Tags |
junooni doesn't get it, wmarone gets it |
|
and I was aware how many people are "into" the iPhone, thus naturally would rate how high they're satisfied; besides...how many of those have their devices jailbroken, or let's say...downloading they're apps illegally, which I would confess would make you pretty satisfied.
how exactly did they preform this study anyway?
oh and notice... to quote the article :
"* Younger users continue to be more satisfied with their handset regardless of whether it is a traditional mobile phone or a smartphone. Satisfaction among traditional mobile phone users 18 years old to 24 years old is 35 index points higher than the segment average, while satisfaction among smartphone users within the same age range is 18 index points above the segment average. "
now what does this footnote tell me?