Say NO! to Qt-based Maemo! - Page 2 - maemo.org

Active Topics

Camera phone competition March 2023 "Endless" (35)
to General by Maemish - 1 day, 16 hrs ago
TLS 1.2 for N9 is ready (28)
to MeeGo / Harmattan by smartblu9 - 1 day, 17 hrs ago
Maemo repository (3)
to Community by torsen - 2 days, 9 hrs ago
Error after installing Leste on sdcard (11)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Maemish - 3 days, 6 hrs ago
Introducing ubiboot N9 (multiboot OS loader) (1,393)
to Alternatives by smatkovi - 4 days, 13 hrs ago
more...

Page 2 of 14

< Prev

Next >

Last »

Thread Tools

lma	2010-04-20 , 11:39
Posts: 2,802 \| Thanked: 4,491 times \| Joined on Nov 2007	#11

Originally Posted by smoku

I love the current Hildon/GTK+/GNOME/Freedesktop/etc. state of affairs and mourn on Qt killing this great platform.

I don't disagree, but this is really old news and done to death in another thread. At least MeeGo will officially support both Qt and GTK+/Clutter.

Quote & Reply |

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to lma For This Useful Post:
b-man, qwerty12, Texrat

	HtheB	2010-04-20 , 11:39
	Moderator \| Posts: 3,718 \| Thanked: 7,420 times \| Joined on Dec 2009 @ Bize Her Yer Trabzon	#12

I don't get this thread at all...

Whats the problem?

__________________
www.HtheB.com
Please donate if you think I'm doing a good job.

Quote & Reply |

Cthulhu	2010-04-20 , 11:39
Posts: 24 \| Thanked: 38 times \| Joined on Dec 2009 @ Denmark	#13

I don't know whether to laugh or cry...

Quote & Reply |

viraptor	2010-04-20 , 11:40
Posts: 49 \| Thanked: 41 times \| Joined on Apr 2010	#14

Originally Posted by admiral0

Welcome to 1995 boys and girls, when nobody doesn't know what oop means.

GObject introduces oop. Please use facts

Quote & Reply |

admiral0	2010-04-20 , 11:43
Posts: 279 \| Thanked: 293 times \| Joined on Oct 2009 @ Italy	#15

Originally Posted by viraptor

GObject introduces oop. Please use facts

Please don't make me laugh. GObject is like a punch in the eye. It forces oop into C where it does not belong.

P.S. I wait for this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x

Quote & Reply |

viraptor	2010-04-20 , 11:46
Posts: 49 \| Thanked: 41 times \| Joined on Apr 2010	#16

Originally Posted by admiral0

Please don't make me laugh. GObject is like a punch in the eye. It forces oop into C where it does not belong.

Syntax does not OOP make

You can always use Vala instead and get (mostly) the same effect.

Quote & Reply |

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to viraptor For This Useful Post:
b-man, Bundyo, mikhas, qwerty12

BlackDiamond	2010-04-20 , 11:49
Posts: 61 \| Thanked: 21 times \| Joined on Jan 2010	#17

C++0x == "The end of us all".

Lot of "modern" coders should attend classes of "old school" programming before learning oop anyway.

Quote & Reply |

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BlackDiamond For This Useful Post:
Fargus, lma

	qwerty12	2010-04-20 , 11:50
	Posts: 4,274 \| Thanked: 5,358 times \| Joined on Sep 2007 @ Looking at y'all and sighing	#18

Originally Posted by lma

At least MeeGo will officially support both Qt and GTK+/Clutter.

How well supported will it be, however? "[...]Included for application compatibility" doesn't really sound "supported".

I don't dislike Qt itself nor the applications written utilizing it, but I fail to see how it's "easier" (except for, what I can tell from my limited knowledge, making custom GUIs).

Last edited by qwerty12; 2010-04-20 at 11:54.

Quote & Reply |

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to qwerty12 For This Useful Post:
Bundyo, Khertan

admiral0	2010-04-20 , 11:50
Posts: 279 \| Thanked: 293 times \| Joined on Oct 2009 @ Italy	#19

Originally Posted by viraptor

Syntax does not OOP make You can always use Vala instead and get (mostly) the same effect.

Vala introduces yet another layer (valac) and needs bindings in a special format (vapi). Why should i shoot myself in the foot?

Quote & Reply |

admiral0	2010-04-20 , 11:52
Posts: 279 \| Thanked: 293 times \| Joined on Oct 2009 @ Italy	#20

Originally Posted by qwerty12

How well supported will it be, however? "[...]Included for application compatibility" doesn't really sound "supported".

I don't dislike Qt itself nor the applications written in it, but I fail to see how it's "easier" (except for, what I can tell from my limited knowledge, making custom GUIs).

Try QT creator or Kdevelop and you'll see