![]() |
2010-05-12
, 07:24
|
Posts: 446 |
Thanked: 79 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#82
|
![]() |
2010-05-12
, 07:26
|
Posts: 543 |
Thanked: 151 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Germany
|
#83
|
![]() |
2010-05-12
, 09:31
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#84
|
i am totally lost. maybe because its after 3 am here. was that sarcasm? i missed it. dang. so am i to assume that you agree? that perhaps nokia should have made a developer device that had all the bells and whistles and easy use of a mass market functional device?
![]() |
2010-05-12
, 17:35
|
Posts: 267 |
Thanked: 183 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Campinas, SP, Brazil
|
#85
|
So, you would rather they shipped 1.2 with whatever problem(s) there were with it, then retracted it, then reissued it even later then it will release?
Nokia IS supporting you. They're working on 1.2 until it actually is an improvement over 1.1, NOT a step backwards from 1.1
Seriously. It will get here eventually. When it does, hopefully, it will be all goodness.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Patola For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-05-12
, 17:41
|
|
Posts: 857 |
Thanked: 362 times |
Joined on Feb 2009
@ London
|
#86
|
People like me which stay moaning and b-i-t-c-h-i-n-g might be seen as an annoyance, but we do that because we still love the N900 and want it to succeed. The other people - who probably outnumber all of us here at the time - just silently quit. I find this a hundred times more annoying.
![]() |
2010-05-12
, 17:52
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#87
|
wow' i wonder.. wouldn't it be easier and probably better to release a device that "makes people happy in terms of mass-market-functionality" that is also super open and developer friendly? that way every one would be happy right?
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to qole For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-05-12
, 18:04
|
Posts: 108 |
Thanked: 53 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Chicago
|
#88
|
I think the next device will try to be exactly that. They will have a "DRM Mode" that will make the carriers happy, with no root access and lots of security features like signed applications, and they'll also have a "hacker mode" for people like me, which will allow root access ... but no DRM. But we hackers aren't supposed to care about DRM anyway, right?
I guess you could say that the next device will be very iPhone-like out of the box, with lots of lock-down, easy-to-use services and shiny apps, but it will ship with a vendor-approved way to "jailbreak" the device.
![]() |
2010-05-12
, 18:05
|
|
Posts: 1,455 |
Thanked: 3,309 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Rochester, NY
|
#89
|
You can live in that dream world all you want, but the reality is another altogether. There are other options in the market and people are leaving the N900 for them.
People like me which stay moaning and b-i-t-c-h-i-n-g might be seen as an annoyance, but we do that because we still love the N900 and want it to succeed. The other people - who probably outnumber all of us here at the time - just silently quit. I find this a hundred times more annoying.
![]() |
2010-05-12
, 18:11
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#90
|
My issue is that we have to wait for the next device. Why couldn't nokia make it clear that it was it was a developer phone so that i didn't have to waste my money on the N900.
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to qole For This Useful Post: | ||
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search