|
2010-06-21
, 22:28
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#22
|
Technically WiFi can never be as ubiquitous as GSM/CDMA due to many reasons (mainly stems from technical limitation). So there'll be quite a lot of areas where the device is not connected to the hive mind (mainly when you're moving about: cars, buses, metros, etc).
Considering how much apps and services that work so much better when you're connected, I'd much prefer if we address the concerns and shortcomings of the more ubiquitous connectivity option... (cost, privacy, connectivity option, etc)
The Following User Says Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-06-21
, 22:28
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#23
|
|
2010-06-21
, 22:51
|
Posts: 46 |
Thanked: 41 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
|
#24
|
|
2010-06-21
, 23:03
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#25
|
The cost of adding 3g to the device is less than you think. It probably adds only few dollars to the manufacturing price of the device. Most of the price you pay covers R&D, marketing etc., and not manufacturing. You want a cheaper device? Do like I did and buy a refurbished unit for less than 350$.
|
2010-06-22
, 00:34
|
|
Posts: 794 |
Thanked: 784 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ /Canada/Ontario/GTA
|
#26
|
|
2010-06-22
, 01:06
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#27
|
You say probably, but in fact it costs very much more than a few dollars, and then there's the additional lost space, weight and screen real-estate we've lost.
|
2010-06-22
, 07:24
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#28
|
I'm just not seeing the case for embedding so many devices with power-sucking, surreptitiously running and space-hogging cellular radios in devices that were never intended to be cell phones.
Long-time readers already know I'm biased toward WIFI-only with bluetooth/USB tethering to a cell-phone.
The Following User Says Thank You to lma For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-06-22
, 08:34
|
Posts: 176 |
Thanked: 149 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#29
|
The Following User Says Thank You to harp For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-06-22
, 09:44
|
|
Posts: 186 |
Thanked: 192 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Finland
|
#30
|
N810: 72*128*14 = 129,024 mm^3
N900: 111*60*19.5 = 129,870 mm^3
Okay, 1% more space... And that's treating the N900 as a box of maximum thickness (when only the camera/kickstand protrudes that far), the same as the N810 (which is essentially flat) -- it's probably the same or less volume in reality.
Bluetooth tethering is fine too, just a bit of extra hassle (one more device to carry around and keep charged).
The Following User Says Thank You to juise- For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
camp ramos, no cellular, wifi cellular |
|
Nokia had the ball (they owned the pitch!) and threw it away.
I've been using my 800 with a 'mifi' thing from 3 network in the uk, on a payg basis (they even do a bundle deal with ipod touch).
and my phone is a tiny nokia.
simples.